-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: enable remark-lint-no-literal-urls #32676
Conversation
34fa5e0
to
d2849c4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Called out the 2 files where the rendering changes
@@ -88,6 +88,6 @@ information described. | |||
* [ ] Make sure the PRs for the vulnerabilities are closed. | |||
|
|||
[H1 CVE requests]: https://hackerone.com/nodejs/cve_requests | |||
[docker-node]: https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node/issues) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These anchor links were incorrect with trailing bracket
README.md
Outdated
@@ -152,392 +152,428 @@ For information about the governance of the Node.js project, see | |||
### TSC (Technical Steering Committee) | |||
|
|||
* [addaleax](https://github.com/addaleax) - | |||
**Anna Henningsen** <anna@addaleax.net> (she/her) | |||
**Anna Henningsen** [anna@addaleax.net](mailto:anna@addaleax.net) (she/her) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the mailto format isn't prefered here, the rule could be disabled at the file level
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think node-core-utils might parse these lines of the README file for some operations. If I'm not wrong about that, then that would need to be tested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
any idea how to test this or who to ping? I'm also good with just disabling at the file or block level
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nodejs/automation-collaborators
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could attempt to use node-core-utils
to land a PR?
The parsing is done in https://github.com/nodejs/node-core-utils/blob/master/lib/collaborators.js.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To avoid conflicts with the tooling, I've disabled the rule at the top of the README and reverted these changes.
I didn't actually test to see if there was an issue with the tool
Upstream PR to fix nodejs/node#32676
@nschonni Am I correct that these are the reasons for doing this?:
Anything else? |
That seems to cover it @Trott. It also makes it explicit when you leave bare links that should be in code blocks like |
d2849c4
to
e0f90bb
Compare
Rebased for conflict |
reflowed for line length after increased url size
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling
e0f90bb
to
8b047bc
Compare
Upstream PR to fix nodejs/node#32676
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Landed in e99ec39...0619b60 |
Upstream PR to fix nodejs/node#32676
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
reflowed for line length after increased url size PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Membership lists are currently formatted in a specific way for tooling PR-URL: #32676 Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Upstream PR to fix nodejs/node#32676
Upstream PR to fix nodejs/node#32676
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes