Skip to content

Conversation

@smith-kyle
Copy link
Contributor

This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this refers
to the parent process exiting before the detached child process is
complete.

This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.
@smith-kyle smith-kyle changed the title Clarify the use of option.detached doc: Clarify the use of option.detached Oct 7, 2015
@mscdex mscdex added child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. labels Oct 8, 2015
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 14, 2015

@trevnorris @cjihrig

@trevnorris
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM as far as I understand how it works, but this isn't one of my areas of expertise.

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Oct 14, 2015

LGTM too

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2015
This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.

Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #3250
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 21, 2015

Landed in 60a3dd4

@jasnell jasnell closed this Oct 21, 2015
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2015
This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.

Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #3250
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

/cc @jasnell LTS?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 23, 2015

@thealphanerd +1
On Oct 23, 2015 11:56 AM, "Myles Borins" notifications@github.com wrote:

/cc @jasnell https://github.com/jasnell LTS?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3250 (comment).

jasnell pushed a commit to jasnell/node that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2015
This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.

Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#3250
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2015
This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.

Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #3250
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 26, 2015

landed in v4.x-staging in 282618e

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2015
This paragraph conveys that detached child processes do not stay
running in the background in general. Instead clarify that this
refers to the parent process exiting before the detached child
process is complete.

Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #3250
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

child_process Issues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants