-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
[v12.x backport] module: drop support for extensionless main entry points in esm #32280
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v12.x backport] module: drop support for extensionless main entry points in esm #32280
Conversation
4d3b533 to
8e8b655
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
8e8b655 to
e1a4de2
Compare
e1a4de2 to
287ef5f
Compare
I've created #32282 to deal with that. |
287ef5f to
4ee0478
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2047cca to
0606e1d
Compare
4ee0478 to
3f31b1a
Compare
3f31b1a to
bb4fbbe
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
bb4fbbe to
3e13dc7
Compare
009d0a2 to
0da01a7
Compare
|
@codebytere I've been struggling with this for over a week now and I just can't get CI to pass. From what I can tell of the CI jobs that are failing, like When I run locally, I get this error with Perhaps we need to increase the allowable delta here? |
|
@codebytere I keep resuming CI, but Can we land this, since the problem appears to be in the staging branch? |
|
As the failure seems unrelated to this PR and on the staging branch I think this is ok to land @codebytere thoughts? |
MylesBorins
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
RSLGTM
63a03d2 to
d577190
Compare
|
@GeoffreyBooth staging should be good to rebase against, then we can get this landed. |
PR-URL: nodejs#31415 Backport-PR-URL: nodejs#32280 Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
0da01a7 to
b6ad757
Compare
|
I've updated the rebase here. |
|
finally green! Landed in 4ee41c5 |
Backport of #31415. Thank you @codebytere for the prompt!
This isn't as clean as it could be because of 04d07ed. @bmeck or @guybedford do you mind double-checking this? I'm assuming that we don't want to merge into 12 the commit that was reverted.