Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual() #23520

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual() #23520

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lrdcasimir
Copy link
Contributor

The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be strictEqual(actual, expected)
rather than strictEqual(expected, actual) which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@lrdcasimir
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
211f4b1 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 12, 2018
@jasnell jasnell removed the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
@jasnell jasnell added code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. and removed code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. labels Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos removed code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. labels Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
@lrdcasimir @BridgeAR
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
8ace654 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: nodejs#23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
@lrdcasimir @BridgeAR
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
ad6b09f 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: nodejs#23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in ad6b09f 🎉

@lrdcasimir congratulations on your commit to Node.js!

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Oct 15, 2018
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
@lrdcasimir @jasnell
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
d5485ec 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: #23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
@lrdcasimir @addaleax
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
c6bc9e7 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: #23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
@lrdcasimir @MylesBorins
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
ad83caf 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: #23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
Closed
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
@lrdcasimir @rvagg
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
780118a 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: #23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
@lrdcasimir @MylesBorins
test: use the correct parameter order on assert.strictEqual()
d54d2f0 
The parameter order for assert.strictEqual() should be actual, expected
rather than expected, actual which can make test failure messages
confusing. This change reverses the order of the assertion to
match the documented parameter order.

PR-URL: #23520
Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@trivikr trivikr trivikr approved these changes

@BridgeAR BridgeAR BridgeAR approved these changes

@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@guybedford guybedford guybedford approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@lrdcasimir @BridgeAR @jasnell @guybedford @cjihrig @gireeshpunathil @trivikr @targos @nodejs-github-bot