-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v8.x backport] async_hooks: add missing async_hooks destroys in AsyncReset #23410
Conversation
@@ -464,6 +464,9 @@ class Parser : public AsyncWrap { | |||
static void Reinitialize(const FunctionCallbackInfo<Value>& args) { | |||
Environment* env = Environment::GetCurrent(args); | |||
|
|||
CHECK(args[0]->IsInt32()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check is actually new for the v8.x branch but since I was adding a new param here anyway (args[1]/isReused
) I figured it wouldn't hurt to copy the existing check from master
here.
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/17737/ As a heads up, this won’t be released in v8.x until #23272 has been in a Current release for 2 weeks, unless this is deemed a critical bugfix (which I assume it won’t be). |
Just for my understanding - "Current release" in this case means a 10.x release, right? So the timeline would be
Is that how this works? As to the criticality: I don't know the criteria for critical bugfixes. The issues causes memory leaks and thus causes processes to die with out-out-of-memory. At least customers of some APM vendors (like my company) are affected. |
This adds missing async_hooks destroy calls for sockets (in _http_agent.js) and HTTP parsers. We need to emit a destroy in AsyncWrap#AsyncReset before assigning a new async_id when the instance has already been in use and is being recycled, because in that case, we have already emitted an init for the "old" async_id. This also removes a duplicated init call for HTTP parser: Each time a new parser was created, AsyncReset was being called via the C++ Parser class constructor (super constructor AsyncWrap) and also via Parser::Reinitialize. PR-URL: nodejs#23272 Fixes: nodejs#19859 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
d9af7ec
to
5f22659
Compare
Rebased this on v8.x-staging to resolve conflict in src/async_wrap.cc. |
This adds missing async_hooks destroy calls for sockets (in _http_agent.js) and HTTP parsers. We need to emit a destroy in AsyncWrap#AsyncReset before assigning a new async_id when the instance has already been in use and is being recycled, because in that case, we have already emitted an init for the "old" async_id. This also removes a duplicated init call for HTTP parser: Each time a new parser was created, AsyncReset was being called via the C++ Parser class constructor (super constructor AsyncWrap) and also via Parser::Reinitialize. Backport-PR-URL: #23410 PR-URL: #23272 Fixes: #19859 Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
landed in 26d145a |
@BethGriggs Any chance this could be included in v8.13.0, that seems to be scheduled for later this month? I'm not familiar with the LTS release process, but #23974 looks like the scope of 8.13.0 is already being defined and this is probably not included. |
This adds missing async_hooks destroy calls for sockets (in
_http_agent.js) and HTTP parsers. We need to emit a destroy in
AsyncWrap#AsyncReset before assigning a new async_id when the instance
has already been in use and is being recycled, because in that case, we
have already emitted an init for the "old" async_id.
This also removes a duplicated init call for HTTP parser: Each time a
new parser was created, AsyncReset was being called via the C++ Parser
class constructor (super constructor AsyncWrap) and also via
Parser::Reinitialize.
PR-URL: #23272
Fixes: #19859
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina matteo.collina@gmail.com
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen anna@addaleax.net
Reviewed-By: James M Snell jasnell@gmail.com
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX) passes