Skip to content

refactor: use of Number.isNaN #17515

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

refactor: use of Number.isNaN #17515

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@mithunsasidharan
Copy link
Contributor

@mithunsasidharan mithunsasidharan commented Dec 7, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Refactored tests to replace isNaN with Number.isNaN

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 7, 2017
@maclover7
Copy link
Contributor

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/11946/

@maclover7 maclover7 added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 8, 2017
@apapirovski
Copy link
Contributor

Landed in b681d8d

@apapirovski apapirovski closed this Dec 8, 2017
apapirovski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2017
@mithunsasidharan @apapirovski
test: use Number.isNaN instead of global isNaN
b681d8d 
PR-URL: #17515
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@mithunsasidharan @MylesBorins
test: use Number.isNaN instead of global isNaN
e812c9c 
PR-URL: #17515
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2017
@mithunsasidharan @MylesBorins
test: use Number.isNaN instead of global isNaN
1aae28b 
PR-URL: #17515
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Dec 12, 2017
Merged
@addaleax addaleax removed the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 13, 2017
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@mithunsasidharan @gibfahn
test: use Number.isNaN instead of global isNaN
ed13aac 
PR-URL: #17515
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Closed
gibfahn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2017
@mithunsasidharan @gibfahn
test: use Number.isNaN instead of global isNaN
e4edb03 
PR-URL: #17515
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anatoli Papirovski <apapirovski@mac.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@gibfahn gibfahn mentioned this pull request Dec 20, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

+2 more reviewers

@apapirovski apapirovski apapirovski approved these changes

@maclover7 maclover7 maclover7 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

test Issues and PRs related to the tests.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants

@mithunsasidharan @maclover7 @apapirovski @lpinca @cjihrig @addaleax @gibfahn @nodejs-github-bot