-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: add basic C++ style guide #16090
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM with two suggestions. Good idea and nice work, Anna!
class FooBar { | ||
public: | ||
void DoSomething(); | ||
static void DoSomethingButItsStaticInstead(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We also use foo()
and set_foo()
for simple getters/setters (with const-correctness whenever possible.)
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
|
||
What it says in the title. | ||
|
||
## Avoid throwing errors in nested C++ methods |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: s/errors/JavaScript errors/ - this section could be interpreted to mean that throw
is allowed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yay 👏
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ | |||
# C++ style guide | |||
|
|||
Unfortunately, the C++ linter (which can be run explicitly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMHO Google's style guide is still a good reference.
...the C++ linter (based on [Google's `cpplint`](https://github.com/google/styleguide), and which can...
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
...); | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## CamelCase for methods, functions and classes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When I grew up this was called PascalCase, and camel case is what's now known as lowerCamelCase
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’ve never heard of that term, and in any case the example’s very purpose is to avoid any ambiguity about what is meant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Cool. Examples beat all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome!
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
}; | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## snake_case for local variables and parameters |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please escape the underscores for non-GitHub markdown readers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks, done!
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
If you need to throw JavaScript errors from a C++ binding method, try to do it | ||
at the top level and not inside of nested calls. | ||
|
||
(Using C++ `throw` is not allowed.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sentence sounds odd being positioned here, sandwiched between two sentences talking about JavaScript errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’ve moved it to the end. I added it because it seemed to make sense to me that, like @bnoordhuis said, there might be confusion about what “throwing” means, but I’d also be happy just dropping it
cc @BridgeAR |
f76063e
to
78d870e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's also:
namespace
does not increase indentation level- Wrap at 80 cols
- Use references (
char&
) only if it's constant (const char&
); otherwise use pointers (char*
)
@TimothyGu This was specifically about things that the linter doesn’t complain about, I’m pretty sure it does for all of these things |
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
rules: | ||
Unfortunately, the C++ linter (based on | ||
[Google’s `cpplint`](https://github.com/google/styleguide)), which can be run | ||
explicitly via `make cpplint`, does not currently catch a lot of rules that are |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this perhaps be make lint-cpp
instead? Running make cppilnt
target produces the following warning:
$ make cpplint
Running C++ linter...
Total errors found: 0
Please use lint-cpp instead of cpplint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danbev yes, I guess so :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FunctionWithAReallyReallyReallyLongNameSeriouslyStopIt
😂
Mind to punctuate the lists?
Aside form the memory section comment though this is very helpful!
Should this doc be top-level, or live inside doc/
? I suppose we may want it visible and then just get rid of it once we get some sort of new linting in place?
- Use `static_cast` for casting whenever it works | ||
- `reinterpret_cast` is okay if `static_cast` is not appropriate | ||
|
||
## Memory allocation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could these two be clarified... slightly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have any specific question? I realize this isn’t helpful when it comes to which-do-I-use, but then again we don’t really follow any specific rules for this right now. (I assume @bnoordhuis is a fan of just aborting in OOM situations, me not so much. 😄)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, ok. On re-reading it I think I understand, maybe we could clarify the wording like so:
- Use `Malloc()`, `Calloc()`, etc. from `util.h` to cause an abort in Out-of-Memory situations.
- Use `UncheckedMalloc()`, etc. to return a `nullptr` in OOM situations.
My first thought would be to put it in doc with the other STYLE_GUIDE. It might be worth including a reference to it in PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md too, but on the other hand that template is already quite long already, and lots of people don't read it (and it wouldn't apply to most PRs). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doc looks great.
Left a few notes, but nothing blocking.
... | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another common pattern is how we handle indentation of initialization lists. example:
HandleWrap::HandleWrap(Environment* env,
Local<Object> object,
uv_handle_t* handle,
AsyncWrap::ProviderType provider)
: AsyncWrap(env, object, provider),
state_(kInitialized),
handle_(handle) {
basically: if the initialization list does not fit on one line then it returns to the next line, indents 4 spaces then starts with the colon. Every additional member in the list starts on a new line and indented 6 spaced, to align with the first member in the list.
- Always avoid C-style casts (`(type)value`) | ||
- `dynamic_cast` does not work because RTTI is not enabled | ||
- Use `static_cast` for casting whenever it works | ||
- `reinterpret_cast` is okay if `static_cast` is not appropriate |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it may be worth mentioning usage of const_cast
(since it's used in core) but not sure if there's a solid rule of when it's acceptable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const_cast: should be used sparingly and only when it's still conceptually const afterwards.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
there is nothing specific to Node about using const_cast
, anything we’d write down here would apply to any other C++ code as well
|
||
```c++ | ||
VeryLongTypeName very_long_result = SomeValueWithAVeryLongName + | ||
SomeOtherValueWithAVeryLongName; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the linter doesn't currently catch whether the operation is at the end of the line or the beginning of the next line. couple examples:
// ternary
int r = true ?
1 : 0;
int r = true
? 1 : 0;
// conditional
if (foo &&
bar) { }
if (foo
&& bar) { }
specify this?
@addaleax /cc @bnoordhuis
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The &&
should go on the same line as the expression preceding it. (edit: but I believe the linter already complains about that.)
Ternary operator: we don't have a hard rule, I think, but IMO if it doesn't fit on a single line, you should be using an if
statement anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
re: placement of &&
. linter doesn't check that. should be possible to add to the linter? if so then no reason to put it here.
I’ve added a sentence for this.
That’s in |
Then maybe in Non-blocking though, feel free to ignore if you disagree. |
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
(Braces are optional if the statement body only has one line.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The parens can probably be dropped here.
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
A lot of code inside Node.js is written so that typechecking etc. is performed | ||
in JavaScript. | ||
|
||
(Using C++ `throw` is not allowed.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parens could be dropped here as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, great to have this guidance written down,
Ideally, most of these things would be enforced via linter rules. This is a first step into having a style guide that goes beyond what the linter currently enforces.
@gibfahn I’m still a bit worried that that would make this a lot less easily discoverable… |
5ca7f32
to
68176fe
Compare
Landing this PR will resolve #12636 |
CPP_STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ | |||
# C++ style guide |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is capitalized in CONTRIBUTING.md, I'd suggest to do the same here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done!
|
||
## Left-leaning (C++ style) asterisks for pointer declarations | ||
|
||
`char* buffer;` instead of `char *buffer;` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No doubt this is correct, but it always bothers me with multiple variables:
void* foo, * bar;
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd just declare one variable per line
|
||
`char* buffer;` instead of `char *buffer;` | ||
|
||
## 2 spaces of indentation for blocks or bodies of conditionals |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also for loops (unless conditionals includes loops).
while (something)
ChangeSomething();
Now that I am thinking about it, I am not sure we use loops without parens...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, conditionals includes conditional loops. :) Anyway, I don’t think the current phrasing leaves anybody thinking that we use indentation other than 2 spaces.
Landed in 23340b9 |
Ideally, most of these things would be enforced via linter rules. This is a first step into having a style guide that goes beyond what the linter currently enforces. PR-URL: #16090 Fixes: #12636 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Ideally, most of these things would be enforced via linter rules. This is a first step into having a style guide that goes beyond what the linter currently enforces. PR-URL: nodejs/node#16090 Fixes: nodejs/node#12636 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Ideally, most of these things would be enforced via linter rules. This is a first step into having a style guide that goes beyond what the linter currently enforces. PR-URL: #16090 Fixes: #12636 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Timothy Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
This does not land cleanly in LTS. Please feel free to manually backport by following the guide. Please also feel free to replace do-not-land if it is being backported |
Ideally, most of these things would be enforced via linter rules. This is a first step into having a style guide that goes beyond what the linter currently enforces.
This is probably relevant to most of: @bnoordhuis @jasnell @TimothyGu @trevnorris @danbev @eugeneo @nodejs/n-api