-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
assert: apply minor refactoring #11511
Conversation
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places.
@@ -299,7 +295,7 @@ function expectedException(actual, expected) { | |||
return false; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(expected) == '[object RegExp]') { | |||
if (Object.prototype.toString.call(expected) === '[object RegExp]') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we import objectToString
from internal/util
at the top and just call it here? And if so, would that be more readable?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could go either way on it. (Let me know if you feel strongly one way or the other.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Importing it is probably better. If we ever move toward storing Object.prototype.toString
in a variable to prevent tampering in userland code, it would require less updating.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Turns out there's already a function internal to assert.js
for this.
¯\(ツ)/¯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(And I see that function is replaced with the one from internal/util
in #11128.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1 to use require('internal/util').objectToString
in case there is another PR to prevent Object.prototype.toString.call()
from being tampered with, though it doesn't need to happen in this PR..#11128 do use objectToString
though
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: nodejs#11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: nodejs#11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: #11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: #11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: #11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
* Remove comment referring to the CommonJS Unit Testing 1.0 spec. This module is no longer intended to comply with that spec. * Remove puzzling "THIS IS NOT TESTED NOR LIKELY TO WORK OUTSIDE V8!" comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time. * Favor `===` over `==` in two places. PR-URL: #11511 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
module is no longer intended to comply with that spec.
comment. No doubt, it made sense at one time.
===
over==
in two places.Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
assert