-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
crypto: don't reference |freelist_max_len| in OpenSSL 1.1.0. #10859
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm OK with this, but another approach would be to simply not define
.setFreeListLength()
for ossl versions that don't support it. Its not a public API, we don't have to keep it, and then the code in _tls_common.js would just not call the API if it doesn't exist.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Happy to do this if people prefer, although you would have to tell me what the recommended pattern in Javascript is for testing whether a function exists or not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets get one more person to weigh in. My pitch is that it is the first step towards just removing the function, which we will want to do, why keep a function around that does nothing? Its very confusing! Also, it makes feature testing very easy.
But its a waste of your time to refactor like I suggest unless @nodejs/crypto or someone else agrees. Lets listen.
You would basically take the ifdef you have around the fn internals now and move them to https://github.com/agl/node/blob/c6404a264e5587dedd0a495f1c91e6d90edcc7ac/src/node_crypto.cc#L297 so the js binding does not get defined. If there are no other uses of SetFreeListLength, you'd have to ifdef out its prototype and def'n as well to avoid compiler whinging.
pattern for testing whether function exists before use is just
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the current approach is fine. Sam's suggestion would make the diff quite a bit larger.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, current approach is better. We can clean up all at once later.