Skip to content

doc: add data types to properties #9399

Description

@cjihrig

Some of the docs specify the type for properties, while others do not. A good first contribution would be to update the properties that are missing this information. As an example, look at https://nodejs.org/api/process.html#process_process_connected vs. https://nodejs.org/api/child_process.html#child_process_child_connected. These two things represent the same concept, but the one in the child_process docs have the data type.

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Nov 2, 2016
  2. tanujasawant commented on Nov 3, 2016

    @tanujasawant
    Contributor

    @JungMinu Are you still planning on working on this issue? I am an Outreachy applicant and a newbie to Open Source. I have been visiting this issue with utmost excitement to see its outcome. Please comment if you're no longer interested.
    Thanks!

  3. Trott commented on Nov 3, 2016

    @Trott
    Member

    I would request that people who already have contributions in the project please refrain from reserving new good first contribution issues. It makes the label considerably less useful for people looking for their actual first contribution.

    (It's a bit different for a good first contribution issue that has been open for a while. If a good first contribution issue has been open for a few weeks, it's probably appropriate to remove the good first contribution label and submit a PR. But that's not the case here.)

  4. tanujasawant commented on Nov 4, 2016

    @tanujasawant
    Contributor

    @Trott Forgive me, I was unaware of the fact that people might still be looking for first contributions. I'll look for other issues. Thanks!

  5. removed their assignment
    on Nov 4, 2016
  6. JungMinu commented on Nov 4, 2016

    @JungMinu
    Member

    @Trott Sorry, it was a mistake. I've just removed self-assignment

  7. imatveev commented on Nov 7, 2016

    @imatveev
    Contributor

    Added most of values in pull-request

  8. imatveev commented on Nov 9, 2016

    @imatveev
    Contributor

    Yet another pull-request

  9. imatveev commented on Nov 16, 2016

    @imatveev
    Contributor

    Yet another pull-request

  10. added
    docIssues and PRs related to Node.js documentation.
    and removed
    docIssues and PRs related to Node.js documentation.
    on Dec 1, 2016
  11. 62 remaining items

  12. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 15, 2017
  13. Trott commented on Jul 15, 2017

    @Trott
    Member

    This issue has been inactive for sufficiently long that it seems like perhaps it should be closed. Feel free to re-open (or leave a comment requesting that it be re-opened) if you disagree. I'm just tidying up and not acting on a super-strong opinion or anything like that.

  14. removed
    good first issueIssues that are suitable for first-time contributors.
    on Jul 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    docIssues and PRs related to Node.js documentation.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions