-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
failing known-issues tests #6527
Comments
All of the failures are:
Ping @Trott from 33c27f8#diff-bee0ad67db456c74881851e227542dbb. There doesn't seem to be a lot of consistency among platforms on this one. |
Argh, looks like it's actually flaky. Sometimes it passes on a platform and sometimes it fails. Will tinker a bit in hopes of making it reliable... |
I've got it failing-as-expected everywhere but Windows. There doesn't seem to be a way to use the |
Oh, |
In the status files there also used to be support for a FAIL status, though I am not sure if it was fully ported from the v8 test runner. On May 4, 2016, at 02:03, Rich Trott <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote: Oh, SKIP seemed to get the job done. PR coming soon. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. |
`test-stdout-buffer-flush-on-exit` was not failing reliably on POSIX machines and not failing at all on Windows. Revised test fails reliably on POSIX and is skipped (in CI) on Windows where the issue does not exist. Fixes: nodejs#6527
`test-stdout-buffer-flush-on-exit` was not failing reliably on POSIX machines and not failing at all on Windows. Revised test fails reliably on POSIX and is skipped (in CI) on Windows where the issue does not exist. Fixes: #6527 PR-URL: #6555 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Joao Reis <reis@janeasystems.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
`test-stdout-buffer-flush-on-exit` was not failing reliably on POSIX machines and not failing at all on Windows. Revised test fails reliably on POSIX and is skipped (in CI) on Windows where the issue does not exist. Fixes: #6527 PR-URL: #6555 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Joao Reis <reis@janeasystems.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
`test-stdout-buffer-flush-on-exit` was not failing reliably on POSIX machines and not failing at all on Windows. Revised test fails reliably on POSIX and is skipped (in CI) on Windows where the issue does not exist. Fixes: #6527 PR-URL: #6555 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Joao Reis <reis@janeasystems.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
`test-stdout-buffer-flush-on-exit` was not failing reliably on POSIX machines and not failing at all on Windows. Revised test fails reliably on POSIX and is skipped (in CI) on Windows where the issue does not exist. Fixes: #6527 PR-URL: #6555 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Joao Reis <reis@janeasystems.com> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
There were no (visible?) known-issues ci jobs run yet so I ran one. there seems to be quite a few failures...
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-known-issues/3/
It is possible some of these are due to platform-specific tests, would there be a better way to denote those? Maybe produce tap
skipped
output?cc @nodejs/testing @cjihrig
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: