Repository navigation
Programmatically using the spec reporter from node:test/reporters doesn't output anything. #48585
Closed as not planned
Description
Version
v20.3.0
Platform
Darwin mbp-nohehf.local 22.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 22.5.0: Thu Jun 8 22:22:20 PDT 2023; root:xnu-8796.121.3~7/RELEASE_ARM64_T6000 arm64
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Having the following minimal reproduction files:
// index.js
import { run } from "node:test";
import process from "node:process";
import { spec } from "node:test/reporters";
run({
files: ["./test.js"],
})
.compose(spec)
.pipe(process.stdout);// test.js
import { it } from "node:test";
import assert from "node:assert";
it("should work", () => {
assert.equal(1, 1);
});Running test.js file via the cli using node --test test.js outputs (as expected):
Running test.js file programmatically via index.js, using node index.js outputs nothing and exits with status code 1.
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
No response
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
Using spec reporter should work programmatically, as tap reporter does.
What do you see instead?
Using spec reporter programmatically outputs nothing and exits with status code 1.
Additional information
No response
Activity
targos commentedon Jun 28, 2023
I think it's a duplicate of #48112
atlowChemi commentedon Jun 28, 2023
Yup 🙂
@nohehf the TL;DR is that
specis a class and need to be instantiated for this to work:// index.js import { run } from "node:test"; import process from "node:process"; import { spec } from "node:test/reporters"; run({ files: ["./test.js"], }) - .compose(spec) + .compose(new spec()) .pipe(process.stdout);nohehf commentedon Jun 29, 2023
Oh thank you. I can open a PR for this in the docs if you want.
PS: sorry I missed the other issue, I did a research but didn't find it.
atlowChemi commentedon Jun 30, 2023
I am not sure about opening a PR to fix the docs, as there are already 2 PRs (both seem inactive for a while) to expose
specas a function: #48202, #48208atlowChemi commentedon Jul 6, 2023
Closing as we agreed this is a duplicate 🙂