async_hooks: add async local storage propagation benchmarks

Add micro-benchmarks to verify the performance degradation related to
the number of active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.

With these benchmarks, trying to improve the async context propagation
to be an O(1) operation, which is an operation more frequent compared
to `asyncLocalStorage.run` and `asyncLocalStorage.getStore`.

PR-URL: #46414
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gerhard Stöbich <deb2001-github@yahoo.de>
Reviewed-By: Minwoo Jung <nodecorelab@gmail.com>

benchmark/async_hooks/async-local-storage-getstore-nested-resources.js

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+'use strict';
+const common = require('../common.js');
+const { AsyncLocalStorage, AsyncResource } = require('async_hooks');
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark verifies the performance of
+ * `AsyncLocalStorage.getStore()` on propagation through async
+ * resource scopes.
+ *
+ * - AsyncLocalStorage.run()
+ *  - AsyncResource.runInAsyncScope
+ *    - AsyncResource.runInAsyncScope
+ *      ...
+ *        - AsyncResource.runInAsyncScope
+ *          - AsyncLocalStorage.getStore()
+ */
+const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
+  resourceCount: [10, 100, 1000],
+  n: [1e4],
+});
+
+function runBenchmark(store, n) {
+  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+    store.getStore();
+  }
+}
+
+function runInAsyncScopes(resourceCount, cb, i = 0) {
+  if (i === resourceCount) {
+    cb();
+  } else {
+    const resource = new AsyncResource('noop');
+    resource.runInAsyncScope(() => {
+      runInAsyncScopes(resourceCount, cb, i + 1);
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+function main({ n, resourceCount }) {
+  const store = new AsyncLocalStorage();
+  runInAsyncScopes(resourceCount, () => {
+    bench.start();
+    runBenchmark(store, n);
+    bench.end(n);
+  });
+}

benchmark/async_hooks/async-local-storage-getstore-nested-run.js

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+'use strict';
+const common = require('../common.js');
+const { AsyncLocalStorage } = require('async_hooks');
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark verifies the performance of
+ * `AsyncLocalStorage.getStore()` on multiple `AsyncLocalStorage` instances
+ * nested `AsyncLocalStorage.run()`s.
+ *
+ * - AsyncLocalStorage1.run()
+ *   - AsyncLocalStorage2.run()
+ *    ...
+ *      - AsyncLocalStorageN.run()
+ *        - AsyncLocalStorage1.getStore()
+ */
+const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
+  sotrageCount: [1, 10, 100],
+  n: [1e4],
+});
+
+function runBenchmark(store, n) {
+  for (let idx = 0; idx < n; idx++) {
+    store.getStore();
+  }
+}
+
+function runStores(stores, value, cb, idx = 0) {
+  if (idx === stores.length) {
+    cb();
+  } else {
+    stores[idx].run(value, () => {
+      runStores(stores, value, cb, idx + 1);
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+function main({ n, sotrageCount }) {
+  const stores = new Array(sotrageCount).fill(0).map(() => new AsyncLocalStorage());
+  const contextValue = {};
+
+  runStores(stores, contextValue, () => {
+    bench.start();
+    runBenchmark(stores[0], n);
+    bench.end(n);
+  });
+}

benchmark/async_hooks/async-local-storage-propagate-asyncresource.js

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+'use strict';
+const common = require('../common.js');
+const { AsyncLocalStorage, AsyncResource } = require('async_hooks');
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark verifies the performance degradation of
+ * async resource propagation on the increasing number of
+ * active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.
+ *
+ * - AsyncLocalStorage.run() * storageCount
+ * - new AsyncResource()
+ * - new AsyncResource()
+ * ...
+ * - N new Asyncresource()
+ */
+const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
+  storageCount: [0, 1, 10, 100],
+  n: [1e3],
+});
+
+function runStores(stores, value, cb, idx = 0) {
+  if (idx === stores.length) {
+    cb();
+  } else {
+    stores[idx].run(value, () => {
+      runStores(stores, value, cb, idx + 1);
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+function runBenchmark(n) {
+  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+    new AsyncResource('noop');
+  }
+}
+
+function main({ n, storageCount }) {
+  const stores = new Array(storageCount).fill(0).map(() => new AsyncLocalStorage());
+  const contextValue = {};
+
+  runStores(stores, contextValue, () => {
+    bench.start();
+    runBenchmark(n);
+    bench.end(n);
+  });
+}

benchmark/async_hooks/async-local-storage-propagate-promise.js

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+'use strict';
+const common = require('../common.js');
+const { AsyncLocalStorage } = require('async_hooks');
+
+/**
+ * This benchmark verifies the performance degradation of
+ * async resource propagation on the increasing number of
+ * active `AsyncLocalStorage`s.
+ *
+ * - AsyncLocalStorage.run()
+ *  - Promise
+ *    - Promise
+ *      ...
+ *        - Promise
+ */
+const bench = common.createBenchmark(main, {
+  storageCount: [0, 1, 10, 100],
+  n: [1e5],
+});
+
+function runStores(stores, value, cb, idx = 0) {
+  if (idx === stores.length) {
+    cb();
+  } else {
+    stores[idx].run(value, () => {
+      runStores(stores, value, cb, idx + 1);
+    });
+  }
+}
+
+async function runBenchmark(n) {
+  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+    // Avoid creating additional ticks.
+    await undefined;
+  }
+}
+
+function main({ n, storageCount }) {
+  const stores = new Array(storageCount).fill(0).map(() => new AsyncLocalStorage());
+  const contextValue = {};
+
+  runStores(stores, contextValue, () => {
+    bench.start();
+    runBenchmark(n).then(() => {
+      bench.end(n);
+    });
+  });
+}