@@ -316,22 +316,19 @@ functions called by `foo`. Outside of `run`, calling `getStore` will return
316316
317317### Troubleshooting: Context loss
318318
319- In most cases your application or library code should have no issues with
320- ` AsyncLocalStorage ` . But in rare cases you may face situations when the
321- current store is lost in one of the asynchronous operations. In those cases,
322- consider the following options.
319+ In most cases, ` AsyncLocalStorage ` works without issues. In rare situations, the
320+ current store is lost in one of the asynchronous operations.
323321
324322If your code is callback-based, it is enough to promisify it with
325- [ ` util.promisify() ` ] [ ] , so it starts working with native promises.
323+ [ ` util.promisify() ` ] [ ] so it starts working with native promises.
326324
327- If you need to keep using callback-based API, or your code assumes
325+ If you need to use a callback-based API or your code assumes
328326a custom thenable implementation, use the [ ` AsyncResource ` ] [ ] class
329- to associate the asynchronous operation with the correct execution context. To
330- do so, you will need to identify the function call responsible for the
331- context loss. You can do that by logging the content of
332- ` asyncLocalStorage.getStore() ` after the calls you suspect are responsible for
333- the loss. When the code logs ` undefined ` , the last callback called is probably
334- responsible for the context loss.
327+ to associate the asynchronous operation with the correct execution context.
328+ Find the function call responsible for the context loss by logging the content
329+ of ` asyncLocalStorage.getStore() ` after the calls you suspect are responsible
330+ for the loss. When the code logs ` undefined ` , the last callback called is
331+ probably responsible for the context loss.
335332
336333## Class: ` AsyncResource `
337334
0 commit comments