@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ For example, at the time of this writing:
3030
3131All older branches are abandoned and are not maintained by the V8 team.
3232
33- ### V8 merge process overview
33+ ### V8 Merge Process Overview
3434
3535The process for backporting bug fixes to active branches is officially
3636documented [ on the V8 wiki] [ V8MergingPatching ] . The summary of the process is:
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/7833
278278 normal and [ V8 CI] [ ] using the Node.js CI system. We only needed to backport
279279 to ` v6.x ` as the other LTS branches weren't affected by this bug.
280280
281- ### Backports Identified by the V8 team
281+ ### Backports Identified by the V8 Team
282282
283283For bugs found through the browser or other channels, the V8 team marks bugs
284284that might be applicable to the abandoned branches in use by Node.js. This is
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ V8 builds against the version of ICU supplied by Node.js,
317317see [ maintaining-icu.md] ( ./maintaining-icu.md ) for special considerations.
318318Specifically, a V8 update may necessitate an ICU update.
319319
320- ### Minor updates (patch level )
320+ ### Minor Updates (Patch Level )
321321
322322Because there may be floating patches on the version of V8 in Node.js, it is
323323safest to apply the patch level updates as a patch. For example, imagine that
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ git node v8 major --branch=5.1-lkgr
382382
383383This should be followed up with manual refloating of all relevant patches.
384384
385- ## Proposal: Using a fork repo to track upstream V8
385+ ## Proposal: Using a Fork Repo to Track Upstream V8
386386
387387The fact that Node.js keeps a vendored, potentially edited copy of V8 in deps/
388388makes the above processes a bit complicated. An alternative proposal would be to
0 commit comments