This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
minimal-kernel
branch
from
September 12, 2018 20:22
6569081
to
2cb7451
Compare
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
minimal-kernel
branch
from
September 12, 2018 20:44
2cb7451
to
6f3f5c9
Compare
MylesBorins
force-pushed
the
minimal-kernel
branch
from
September 12, 2018 21:54
6f3f5c9
to
a40b8a9
Compare
updated based on feedback. Biggest changes
|
* Rewrite: emphasize that minimal kernel is just the first phase of a multistage process, add more features and more links to features, use complete sentences.
Updated significantly based on feedback I received from @GeoffreyBooth As such I'm dismissing all current reviews. PTAL |
MylesBorins
dismissed stale reviews from mcollina and guybedford
September 20, 2018 19:47
Significant changes since review
Amazing! |
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2018
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2019
Refs: nodejs/modules#180 PR-URL: #6 PR-URL: #12 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
added a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 26, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
nodejs-ci
pushed a commit
to nodejs/ecmascript-modules
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2019
Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: #6 Refs: #12 Refs: #28 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
to MylesBorins/node
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2019
This PR updates the current `--experimental-modules` implementation based on the work of the modules team and reflects Phase 2 of our new modules plan. The largest differences from the current implementation include * `packge.type` which can be either `module` or `commonjs` - `type: "commonjs"`: - `.js` is parsed as commonjs - default for entry point without an extension is commonjs - `type: "module"`: - `.js` is parsed as esm - does not support loading JSON or Native Module by default - default for entry point without an extension is esm * `--entry-type=[mode]` - allows you set the type on entry point. * A new file extension `.cjs`. - this is specifically to support importing commonjs in the `module` mode. - this is only in the esm loader, the commonjs loader remains untouched, but the extension will work in the old loader if you use the full file path. * `--es-module-specifier-resolution=[type]` - options are `explicit` (default) and `node` - by default our loader will not allow for optional extensions in the import, the path for a module must include the extension if there is one - by default our loader will not allow for importing directories that have an index file - developers can use `--es-module-specifier-resolution=node` to enable the commonjs specifier resolution algorithm - This is not a “feature” but rather an implementation for experimentation. It is expected to change before the flag is removed * `--experimental-json-loader` - the only way to import json when `"type": "module"` - when enable all `import 'thing.json'` will go through the experimental loader independent of mode - based on whatwg/html#4315 * You can use `package.main` to set an entry point for a module - the file extensions used in main will be resolved based on the `type` of the module Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/blob/master/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#6 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#12 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#28 Refs: nodejs/modules#255 Refs: whatwg/html#4315 Refs: WICG/webcomponents#770 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Evan Plaice <evanplaice@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com> Co-authored-by: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> PR-URL: nodejs#26745 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
to nodejs/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2019
This PR updates the current `--experimental-modules` implementation based on the work of the modules team and reflects Phase 2 of our new modules plan. The largest differences from the current implementation include * `packge.type` which can be either `module` or `commonjs` - `type: "commonjs"`: - `.js` is parsed as commonjs - default for entry point without an extension is commonjs - `type: "module"`: - `.js` is parsed as esm - does not support loading JSON or Native Module by default - default for entry point without an extension is esm * `--entry-type=[mode]` - allows you set the type on entry point. * A new file extension `.cjs`. - this is specifically to support importing commonjs in the `module` mode. - this is only in the esm loader, the commonjs loader remains untouched, but the extension will work in the old loader if you use the full file path. * `--es-module-specifier-resolution=[type]` - options are `explicit` (default) and `node` - by default our loader will not allow for optional extensions in the import, the path for a module must include the extension if there is one - by default our loader will not allow for importing directories that have an index file - developers can use `--es-module-specifier-resolution=node` to enable the commonjs specifier resolution algorithm - This is not a “feature” but rather an implementation for experimentation. It is expected to change before the flag is removed * `--experimental-json-loader` - the only way to import json when `"type": "module"` - when enable all `import 'thing.json'` will go through the experimental loader independent of mode - based on whatwg/html#4315 * You can use `package.main` to set an entry point for a module - the file extensions used in main will be resolved based on the `type` of the module Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/modules/blob/master/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md Refs: https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal Refs: nodejs/modules#180 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#6 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#12 Refs: nodejs/ecmascript-modules#28 Refs: nodejs/modules#255 Refs: whatwg/html#4315 Refs: WICG/webcomponents#770 Co-authored-by: Myles Borins <MylesBorins@google.com> Co-authored-by: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Evan Plaice <evanplaice@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com> Co-authored-by: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> PR-URL: #26745 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Coe <bencoe@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Сковорода Никита Андреевич <chalkerx@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Decided to submit this as a PR to comment and land as documentation.
Thoughts?