-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build on Github Action test-macOS frequently fail due machine run out of disk space #3878
Comments
GitHub only offers 14 GB of storage on their "standard" runners: https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/using-github-hosted-runners/about-github-hosted-runners#standard-github-hosted-runners-for-public-repositories Unlike for Linux and Windows, GitHub do not offer more storage on their "large" (i.e. paid) runners (still 14 GB for macOS): https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-github-hosted-runners/using-larger-runners/about-larger-runners#specifications-for-general-larger-runners Apparently the amount of available disk space available decreased (albeit still with 14 GB available and therefore meeting GH's documented available storage) with GH's 20240827.4 macOS runner image -- there's a general discussion around this over in: actions/runner-images#10511 I'm aware of various hacks/scripts for the Ubuntu runners to reclaim space (see actions/runner-images#10386) but not for macOS. I do not know if there is anything we can do to reduce the size of Node.js macOS builds -- they appear to be significantly larger than their Linux equivalents. |
Should we disable macOS jobs for now? |
The problem is that we would have 0 CI coverage for arm64 macOS if we do it (Jenkins CI currently only tests on x64) |
Do we need Android sdk for macOS arm64 build? Any chance we can temporarily remove it (with a quick patch) from the |
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: nodejs#54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Fixed by nodejs/node#54658 |
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: nodejs/node#54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: #54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: nodejs/node#54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> PR-URL: #182 Refs: nodejs/node#54658 Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/build#3878 PR-URL: nodejs#54658 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
The Github Actions start to fail frequently on test-macOS build step due to the current build on mac is about 18GB which seems more than the allocated disk space on the runner (14GB limit IIRC). See this for a failure example:
This currently impacts all the Pull Requests on nodejs cores.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: