Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2024-07-10 #1592

Closed
mhdawson opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2024-07-10 #1592

mhdawson opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member

mhdawson commented Jul 8, 2024

Time

UTC Wed 10-Jul-2024 15:00 (03:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Wed 10-Jul-2024 08:00 (08:00 AM)
US / Mountain Wed 10-Jul-2024 09:00 (09:00 AM)
US / Central Wed 10-Jul-2024 10:00 (10:00 AM)
US / Eastern Wed 10-Jul-2024 11:00 (11:00 AM)
EU / Western Wed 10-Jul-2024 16:00 (04:00 PM)
EU / Central Wed 10-Jul-2024 17:00 (05:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Wed 10-Jul-2024 18:00 (06:00 PM)
Moscow Wed 10-Jul-2024 18:00 (06:00 PM)
Chennai Wed 10-Jul-2024 20:30 (08:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 10-Jul-2024 23:00 (11:00 PM)
Tokyo Thu 11-Jul-2024 00:00 (12:00 AM)
Sydney Thu 11-Jul-2024 01:00 (01:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/node

  • npm is installed wrongly on windows machine #53538

nodejs/TSC

  • New Strategic Initiative on Primordials #1439

nodejs/next-10

  • Next 10 - Funding Deep Dive #273

Invited

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with tsc-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password

Public participation

We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.


Invitees

Please use the following emoji reactions in this post to indicate your
availability.

  • 👍 - Attending
  • 👎 - Not attending
  • 😕 - Not sure yet
@mhdawson mhdawson self-assigned this Jul 8, 2024
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jul 8, 2024

If we're truly going to discuss nodejs/node#53538 in the meeting, maybe we should invite some npm folks to attend (and postpone discussion until they can make it, and maybe adjust the meeting time to accommodate them next week or whatever). As @benjamingr mentioned in the issue itself, a discussion within the TSC is unlikely to result in anything useful. But a discussion with the involvement of npm folks might at least get the TSC and npm on the same page about one or more of whether this will be fixed, how it will be fixed, when it will be fixed, why it will never be fixed, what everyone should tell users who encounter this (which sounds like it's npm i -g npm)....

Another possibility is for the TSC to "discuss" it but to basically delegate the conversation above (with the npm team) to the Release team. (I'm assuming the Release team is ultimately responsible for the installer. If it's Build instead, then fine, delegate to Build. The point is: Delegate to people who really have a stake. It can even be an ad hoc team to make sure to include @tniessen if he's still invested, and anyone else obviously invested.)

@richardlau
Copy link
Member

Another possibility is for the TSC to "discuss" it but to basically delegate the conversation above (with the npm team) to the Release team. (I'm assuming the Release team is ultimately responsible for the installer. If it's Build instead, then fine, delegate to Build. The point is: Delegate to people who really have a stake. It can even be an ad hoc team to make sure to include @tniessen if he's still invested, and anyone else obviously invested.)

The installer doesn't fall into either Release or Build, based on the responsibilities devolved to those Working Groups.

@GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member

Not sure if this warrants being added to the agenda, but I’d appreciate some guidance on whether people think nodejs/node#53619, unflagging --experimental-detect-module, is semver-major. If it is, I guess we should introduce a --detect-module flag so that Node <23 can benefit from this feature after it’s unflagged in >=23.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

mhdawson commented Jul 9, 2024

There is private business to discuss so lets hold the meeting even if it ends up being short.

@mhdawson
Copy link
Member Author

PR for minutes - #1594

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants