Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

npm LTS #14

Closed
rvagg opened this issue Jul 1, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

npm LTS #14

rvagg opened this issue Jul 1, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Jul 1, 2015

Following up from @zkat's comment in the summit repo about npm 2.x LTS: openjs-foundation/summit#1 (comment) we should pull that discussion into here because we're going to have to care about this for 0.12 maintenance at least. We should ensure that we have synchronized goals and ideas about what LTS means so that we don't end up in conflict about what we're happy to pull in for npm for LTS releases.

@zkat perhaps you could tune us in to ongoing discussions about npm LTS or maybe someone over there could join our meeting next week to sync? Monday 1pm PT.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Jul 22, 2015

@zkat ... would you be able to join us for the next LTS WG meeting to discuss npm LTS?

@zkat
Copy link

zkat commented Jul 25, 2015

Hey! Sorry for the delay. I had trouble pinning down the info I needed to be able to give you a good response about this.

But now I have it! So!

I can do next Monday at 13:00 PT if that's alright, assuming that's still the time for it? :)

/cc @othiym23

@othiym23
Copy link

I will do my best to get @zkat up to speed with my (wooly, vague) thoughts about how npm can best support the LTS process before the meeting.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Jul 25, 2015

@zkat @othiym23 👍 thank you both very much

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Oct 30, 2015

Closing this in favor of #37

@jasnell jasnell closed this as completed Oct 30, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants