-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@nodejs/releasers health #1036
Comments
FWIW this discrepancy is because #1024 hasn't landed yet (but the teams have been updated). More specifically, I was keeping that open to track the offboarding checklist in #1024 (comment). Edit: landed now so the lists are in sync. |
SGTM - this is somewhat worrisome. We should try to recruit more releasers (says somebody who has never done a Node.js release after being on the TSC for many years :/). |
fwiw I'm still happy to be a releaser, if "not being a collaborator" stops being a barrier. |
Pinging the ones that are subject to be moved to emeritus: If any of you would like to remain on the active list, please let me know! I'll proceed with this right after the next releasers meeting. |
I've been a bit busy lately, but I had previously volunteered (#926) and that did not really move forward. |
@RafaelGSS Please leave me on the active list for now as I still plan to contribute whenever possible |
@RafaelGSS I would like to continue being a releaser. |
Looks like we won't have a Releasers meeting anytime soon. I'll proceed with off-boarding at the end of the week.
|
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry I meant Node.js collaborator |
* doc: move releasers to emeritus Refs: #1036 * fixup! doc: move releasers to emeritus
I volunteer! We already talked with @RafaelGSS and I've started attending meetings to get an idea of how things work, and I'll try to step up the contributions to hopefully get a Collaborator status soon |
Refs: nodejs/Release#1042 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1040 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1041 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1042 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1040 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1041 PR-URL: #55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1042 PR-URL: nodejs#55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1040 PR-URL: nodejs#55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Refs: nodejs/Release#1041 PR-URL: nodejs#55399 Refs: nodejs/Release#1036 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Hi folks,
During the latest Node.js Release WG meeting we discussed the project health and the importance of leaving only active members with permissions for the threats evaluated by nodejs/TSC#1618.
Currently, we have a list of 11 releasers (in the README, and 10 with permissions https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/releasers) but just a few of them are making releases this year. The idea is to finalize this task with a real active nodejs releasers list and seek new releasers if needed (possibly yes).
This is the list of 2024 releases: https://github.com/RafaelGSS/nodejs-stats/blob/main/releases/2024-releases.csv.
Releasers:
cc: @nodejs/releasers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: