Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2017. It is now read-only.

Roadmap WG status #16

Closed
Closed
@williamkapke

Description

@williamkapke

Does Roadmap still need a WG?

Roles defined by their charter are:

  • Attract and summarize user community needs and feedback.
  • Find or potentially create tools that allow for broader participation.
  • Create Pull Requests for relevant changes to ROADMAP.md

The members are:
@mikeal, @piscisaureus, @chrisdickinson, @bnb

2 Topics discussed this year:

  • Should Node.js be VM neutral in the future?
  • Building node as a shared library instead of an executable

I think these responsibilities can be handled by the CTC and a WG isn't needed. I hope this doesn't rub anyone the wrong way- but there has been a lot of discussion lately about what can be done to ensure there are "active contributing individuals"... but in some cases, there isn't enough activity to determine this. Additionally, without activity- how would NEW members ever get involved?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions