Uncomment to_std and from_std methods for IpAddr #1043
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 11, 2019
1043: Uncomment to_std and from_std methods for IpAddr r=asomers a=rabbott99 These were commented out in 2b60633, apparently because `std::net::IpAddr` had been removed from the standard library. However, `IpAddr` has since been re-added to the standard library (rust-lang/rust#23711) and stabilized (rust-lang/rust#31438), so it seems there is no reason to keep them commented out. Co-authored-by: rabbott99 <rabbott4927@gmail.com>
Build succeeded
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These were commented out in 2b60633, apparently because
std::net::IpAddrhad been removed from the standard library. However,IpAddrhas since been re-added to the standard library (rust-lang/rust#23711) and stabilized (rust-lang/rust#31438), so it seems there is no reason to keep them commented out.