You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2022. It is now read-only.
The return statement should be:
return self.l1.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l3.log_variational_posterior
instead of the current :
return self.l1.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
Currently, the log posterior of l2 is being counted twice and the log posterior of l3 is not being taken into account at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
The return statement should be:
return self.l1.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l3.log_variational_posterior
instead of the current :
return self.l1.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
+ self.l2.log_variational_posterior
Currently, the log posterior of l2 is being counted twice and the log posterior of l3 is not being taken into account at all.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: