Closed
Description
as #12918 shows, tasyncclosestall.nim is still a flaky test
Example
see CI failure for #12918
Current Output
PASS: tests/async/tasyncawait_cyclebreaker.nim C ( 6.39586997 secs)
FAIL: tests/async/tasyncclosestall.nim C
Test "tests/async/tasyncclosestall.nim" in category "async"
Failure: reExitcodesDiffer
Expected:
exitcode: 0
Gotten:
exitcode: 1
Output:
tasyncclosestall.nim(99) tasyncclosestall
asyncmacro.nim(313) server
asyncmacro.nim(34) serverNimAsyncContinue
tasyncclosestall.nim(87) serverIter
asyncnet.nim(632) bindAddr
oserr.nim(94) raiseOSError
[[reraised from:
tasyncclosestall.nim(99) tasyncclosestall
asyncdispatch.nim(1884) waitFor
asyncfutures.nim(383) read
]]
Error: unhandled exception: Address already in use
Async traceback:
tasyncclosestall.nim(99) tasyncclosestall
asyncmacro.nim(313) server
asyncmacro.nim(34) serverNimAsyncContinue
## Resumes an async procedure
tasyncclosestall.nim(87) serverIter
asyncnet.nim(632) bindAddr
oserr.nim(94) raiseOSError
Exception message: Address already in use
Exception type: [OSError]
PASS: tests/async/tasyncconnect.nim C ( 2.38197374 secs)
Expected Output
works
Additional Information
this test previously had surgery #12744
This test is very flaky, this change might help reducing the
but is still flaky (perhaps with a different error msg)
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels
Activity