Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add mapping for lock wait timeout #45559

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

kesselb
Copy link
Contributor

@kesselb kesselb commented May 29, 2024

  • Resolves: noid

Summary

Add mapping for lock wait timeout.

TODO

  • CI
  • Review

Checklist

@kesselb kesselb added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label May 29, 2024
@kesselb kesselb added this to the Nextcloud 30 milestone May 29, 2024
@kesselb kesselb self-assigned this May 29, 2024
Signed-off-by: Daniel Kesselberg <mail@danielkesselberg.de>
@kesselb kesselb force-pushed the bug/noid/add-reason-lock-wait-timeout branch from 9569756 to 3fb0aa4 Compare May 29, 2024 09:10
@kesselb kesselb changed the title enh(dbal): add mapping for lock wait timeout add mapping for lock wait timeout May 29, 2024
@kesselb kesselb merged commit 75ce3b3 into master May 29, 2024
155 checks passed
@kesselb kesselb deleted the bug/noid/add-reason-lock-wait-timeout branch May 29, 2024 12:22
*
* @since 30.0.0
*/
public const REASON_LOCK_WAIT_TIMEOUT = 15;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kesselb
Copy link
Contributor Author

kesselb commented Jul 19, 2024

Docs: nextcloud/documentation#12046

@kesselb kesselb removed the pending documentation This pull request needs an associated documentation update label Jul 19, 2024
@blizzz blizzz mentioned this pull request Jul 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants