Skip to content

fix: Build for Swift 5.x on Linux #76

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Dec 25, 2024
Merged

fix: Build for Swift 5.x on Linux #76

merged 10 commits into from
Dec 25, 2024

Conversation

cbaker6
Copy link
Member

@cbaker6 cbaker6 commented Oct 25, 2024

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.41%. Comparing base (4742807) to head (398b4cf).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #76      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.24%   37.41%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1184     1184              
==========================================
+ Hits          441      443       +2     
+ Misses        743      741       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cbaker6 cbaker6 changed the title Update Dockerfile fix: Build correctly for Swift 6 Oct 25, 2024
@cbaker6 cbaker6 changed the title fix: Build correctly for Swift 6 fix: Build correctly for Swift 6 on Linux Oct 25, 2024
@cbaker6 cbaker6 changed the title fix: Build correctly for Swift 6 on Linux fix: Build for Swift 5.x on Linux Dec 25, 2024
@cbaker6 cbaker6 merged commit a33295c into main Dec 25, 2024
5 checks passed
@cbaker6 cbaker6 deleted the cbaker6-patch-1 branch December 25, 2024 07:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant