Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simplify the installation process of the package #101

Closed
Inkdpixels opened this issue Mar 26, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Simplify the installation process of the package #101

Inkdpixels opened this issue Mar 26, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@Inkdpixels
Copy link
Contributor

Let's get rid of the manual installation process and move to a composer require one instead. @aertmann offered help here, @skurfuerst was also interested I think. Anyway, any help is reeeally appreciated here! 💯 (AIRHORN)

@skurfuerst
Copy link
Member

I currently don't yet see how we can work with a composer require way of installing without adding the compiled assets to Git. This can be of course done by e.g. a Jenkins job.

What do you think about this? Basically it would pollute the history some more, but on the other hand it would work with pull requests etc...

That's what we do with Neos -- and there it works fine.

All the best,
Sebastian

@Inkdpixels
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is this solved due to #135?

@RafaelKa
Copy link

RafaelKa commented Oct 24, 2016

@Inkdpixels, no, its not done on#135.

We can push(deploy) directly after successfull build from travis back to the repo and adding [ci skip] to commit message to avoid infinite loops.

see travis docs for customizing the build

Also we do not need any external services to provide a package, which is ready for usage with "pure composer" installation.

So we can get more demo views and maybe more feedback from users.

@grebaldi grebaldi added this to the alpha milestone Oct 25, 2016
@skurfuerst skurfuerst self-assigned this Nov 24, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants