Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pageserver: direct I/O #8130

Open
3 of 19 tasks
jcsp opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Open
3 of 19 tasks

pageserver: direct I/O #8130

jcsp opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 7 comments
Assignees
Labels
c/storage/pageserver Component: storage: pageserver t/feature Issue type: feature, for new features or requests

Comments

@jcsp
Copy link
Contributor

jcsp commented Jun 21, 2024

Project Slack: #proj-pageserver-direct-io


Currently, we do buffered reads of data pages. Direct reads would be a better fit, because:

  • Pageserver data pages have an extremely low temporal locality on reads, because any repeatedly accessed pages are cached inside postgres. This makes it largely a waste of memory, which we could be using for other things.
  • The kernel page cache gives deceptively fast read performance on lightly loaded pageservers, making performance less consistent as pageservers are packed with larger numbers of tenants.

Tasks

Backpointer to the Slack DMs between John and Christian about this: https://neondb.slack.com/archives/D05KTCVS40H/p1718977335312439

Phase 1 Impl

  1. c/storage/pageserver t/feature
    yliang412
  2. problame yliang412
  3. c/storage/pageserver
    yliang412
  4. c/storage/pageserver
    yliang412
  5. yliang412

Phase 2 Impl

Phase 3 Impl: Performance

@jcsp jcsp added t/feature Issue type: feature, for new features or requests c/storage/pageserver Component: storage: pageserver labels Jun 21, 2024
@problame problame changed the title pageserver: direct I/O for reads pageserver: direct I/O Jul 9, 2024
@problame
Copy link
Contributor

problame commented Jul 9, 2024

The direct IO RFC covers both read & write path. Renamed this epic to include reads and writes. (I don't think it's significantly more work).

@yliang412 yliang412 self-assigned this Jul 29, 2024
yliang412 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 7, 2024
Part of #8130, [RFC: Direct IO For Pageserver](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/blob/problame/direct-io-rfc/docs/rfcs/034-direct-io-for-pageserver.md)

## Description

Add pageserver config for evaluating/enabling direct I/O. 

- Disabled: current default, uses buffered io as is.
- Evaluate: still uses buffered io, but could do alignment checking and
perf simulation (pad latency by direct io RW to a fake file).
- Enabled: uses direct io, behavior on alignment error is configurable.


Signed-off-by: Yuchen Liang <yuchen@neon.tech>
jcsp pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 12, 2024
Part of #8130, [RFC: Direct IO For Pageserver](https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/blob/problame/direct-io-rfc/docs/rfcs/034-direct-io-for-pageserver.md)

## Description

Add pageserver config for evaluating/enabling direct I/O. 

- Disabled: current default, uses buffered io as is.
- Evaluate: still uses buffered io, but could do alignment checking and
perf simulation (pad latency by direct io RW to a fake file).
- Enabled: uses direct io, behavior on alignment error is configurable.


Signed-off-by: Yuchen Liang <yuchen@neon.tech>
@yliang412
Copy link
Contributor

Last week:

  • Drafted PS Config for Direct I/O
  • Setup managed testbench on EC2

This week:

  • Finish Simulation Mode + alignment check
  • Use aligned buffers on read path

@problame
Copy link
Contributor

problame commented Aug 13, 2024

sync meeting:

@yliang412
Copy link
Contributor

@yliang412
Copy link
Contributor

yliang412 commented Aug 26, 2024

Last week:

problame added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
refs #6989

Problem
-------

After unclean shutdown, we get restarted and read the local filesystem
to make decisions on those reads. Some of the data might have not yet
been fsynced when the unclean shutdown completed.

Durability matters even though Pageservers are conceptually just a cache
of state in S3. For example:
- the cloud control plane is no control loop => pageserver responses
  to tenant attachmentm, etc, needs to be durable.
  - the storage controller does not rely on this (as much?)
- we don't have layer file checksumming, so, downloaded+renamed but not
  fsynced layer files are technically not to be trusted
  - #2683

Solution
--------

`syncfs` the tenants directory during startup, before we start reading from it.

This is a bit overkill because we do remove some temp files (InMemoryLayer!)
later during startup. Further, these temp files are particularly likely to
be dirty in the kernel page cache. However, we don't want to refactor that
cleanup code right now, and the dirty data on pageservers is generally
not that high. Last, with [direct
IO](#8130) we're going to
have near-zero kernel page cache anyway quite soon.
problame added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
refs #6989

Problem
-------

After unclean shutdown, we get restarted and read the local filesystem
to make decisions on those reads. Some of the data might have not yet
been fsynced when the unclean shutdown completed.

Durability matters even though Pageservers are conceptually just a cache
of state in S3. For example:
- the cloud control plane is no control loop => pageserver responses
  to tenant attachmentm, etc, needs to be durable.
  - the storage controller does not rely on this (as much?)
- we don't have layer file checksumming, so, downloaded+renamed but not
  fsynced layer files are technically not to be trusted
  - #2683

Solution
--------

`syncfs` the tenants directory during startup, before we start reading from it.

This is a bit overkill because we do remove some temp files (InMemoryLayer!)
later during startup. Further, these temp files are particularly likely to
be dirty in the kernel page cache. However, we don't want to refactor that
cleanup code right now, and the dirty data on pageservers is generally
not that high. Last, with [direct
IO](#8130) we're going to
have near-zero kernel page cache anyway quite soon.
problame added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
refs #6989

Problem
-------

After unclean shutdown, we get restarted, start reading the local
filesystem,
and make decisions based on those reads. However, some of the data might
have
not yet been fsynced when the unclean shutdown completed.

Durability matters even though Pageservers are conceptually just a cache
of state in S3. For example:
- the cloud control plane is no control loop => pageserver responses
  to tenant attachmentm, etc, needs to be durable.
  - the storage controller does not rely on this (as much?)
- we don't have layer file checksumming, so, downloaded+renamed but not
  fsynced layer files are technically not to be trusted
  - #2683

Solution
--------

`syncfs` the tenants directory during startup, before we start reading
from it.

This is a bit overkill because we do remove some temp files
(InMemoryLayer!)
later during startup. Further, these temp files are particularly likely
to
be dirty in the kernel page cache. However, we don't want to refactor
that
cleanup code right now, and the dirty data on pageservers is generally
not that high. Last, with [direct
IO](#8130) we're going to
have near-zero kernel page cache anyway quite soon.
yliang412 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2024
Part of #8130, closes #8719.

## Problem

Currently, vectored blob io only coalesce blocks if they are immediately
adjacent to each other. When we switch to Direct IO, we need a way to
coalesce blobs that are within the dio-aligned boundary but has gap
between them.

## Summary of changes

- Introduces a `VectoredReadCoalesceMode` for `VectoredReadPlanner` and
`StreamingVectoredReadPlanner` which has two modes:
  - `AdjacentOnly` (current implementation)
  - `Chunked(<alignment requirement>)`
- New `ChunkedVectorBuilder` that considers batching `dio-align`-sized
read, the start and end of the vectored read will respect
`stx_dio_offset_align` / `stx_dio_mem_align` (`vectored_read.start` and
`vectored_read.blobs_at.first().start_offset` will be two different
value).
- Since we break the assumption that blobs within single `VectoredRead`
are next to each other (implicit end offset), we start to store blob end
offsets in the `VectoredRead`.
- Adapted existing tests to run in both `VectoredReadCoalesceMode`.
- The io alignment can also be live configured at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Yuchen Liang <yuchen@neon.tech>
yliang412 added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2024
Part of #8130, closes #8719.

## Problem

Currently, vectored blob io only coalesce blocks if they are immediately
adjacent to each other. When we switch to Direct IO, we need a way to
coalesce blobs that are within the dio-aligned boundary but has gap
between them.

## Summary of changes

- Introduces a `VectoredReadCoalesceMode` for `VectoredReadPlanner` and
`StreamingVectoredReadPlanner` which has two modes:
  - `AdjacentOnly` (current implementation)
  - `Chunked(<alignment requirement>)`
- New `ChunkedVectorBuilder` that considers batching `dio-align`-sized
read, the start and end of the vectored read will respect
`stx_dio_offset_align` / `stx_dio_mem_align` (`vectored_read.start` and
`vectored_read.blobs_at.first().start_offset` will be two different
value).
- Since we break the assumption that blobs within single `VectoredRead`
are next to each other (implicit end offset), we start to store blob end
offsets in the `VectoredRead`.
- Adapted existing tests to run in both `VectoredReadCoalesceMode`.
- The io alignment can also be live configured at runtime.

Signed-off-by: Yuchen Liang <yuchen@neon.tech>
problame added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 28, 2024
…lush (#8537)

Part of [Epic: Bypass PageCache for user data
blocks](#7386).

# Problem

`InMemoryLayer` still uses the `PageCache` for all data stored in the
`VirtualFile` that underlies the `EphemeralFile`.

# Background

Before this PR, `EphemeralFile` is a fancy and (code-bloated) buffered
writer around a `VirtualFile` that supports `blob_io`.

The `InMemoryLayerInner::index` stores offsets into the `EphemeralFile`.
At those offset, we find a varint length followed by the serialized
`Value`.

Vectored reads (`get_values_reconstruct_data`) are not in fact vectored
- each `Value` that needs to be read is read sequentially.

The `will_init` bit of information which we use to early-exit the
`get_values_reconstruct_data` for a given key is stored in the
serialized `Value`, meaning we have to read & deserialize the `Value`
from the `EphemeralFile`.

The L0 flushing **also** needs to re-determine the `will_init` bit of
information, by deserializing each value during L0 flush.

# Changes

1. Store the value length and `will_init` information in the
`InMemoryLayer::index`. The `EphemeralFile` thus only needs to store the
values.
2. For `get_values_reconstruct_data`:
- Use the in-memory `index` figures out which values need to be read.
Having the `will_init` stored in the index enables us to do that.
- View the EphemeralFile as a byte array of "DIO chunks", each 512 bytes
in size (adjustable constant). A "DIO chunk" is the minimal unit that we
can read under direct IO.
- Figure out which chunks need to be read to retrieve the serialized
bytes for thes values we need to read.
- Coalesce chunk reads such that each DIO chunk is only read once to
serve all value reads that need data from that chunk.
- Merge adjacent chunk reads into larger
`EphemeralFile::read_exact_at_eof_ok` of up to 128k (adjustable
constant).
3. The new `EphemeralFile::read_exact_at_eof_ok` fills the IO buffer
from the underlying VirtualFile and/or its in-memory buffer.
4. The L0 flush code is changed to use the `index` directly, `blob_io` 
5. We can remove the `ephemeral_file::page_caching` construct now.

The `get_values_reconstruct_data` changes seem like a bit overkill but
they are necessary so we issue the equivalent amount of read system
calls compared to before this PR where it was highly likely that even if
the first PageCache access was a miss, remaining reads within the same
`get_values_reconstruct_data` call from the same `EphemeralFile` page
were a hit.

The "DIO chunk" stuff is truly unnecessary for page cache bypass, but,
since we're working on [direct
IO](#8130) and
#8719 specifically, we need
to do _something_ like this anyways in the near future.

# Alternative Design

The original plan was to use the `vectored_blob_io` code it relies on
the invariant of Delta&Image layers that `index order == values order`.

Further, `vectored_blob_io` code's strategy for merging IOs is limited
to adjacent reads. However, with direct IO, there is another level of
merging that should be done, specifically, if multiple reads map to the
same "DIO chunk" (=alignment-requirement-sized and -aligned region of
the file), then it's "free" to read the chunk into an IO buffer and
serve the two reads from that buffer.
=> #8719

# Testing / Performance

Correctness of the IO merging code is ensured by unit tests.

Additionally, minimal tests are added for the `EphemeralFile`
implementation and the bit-packed `InMemoryLayerIndexValue`.

Performance testing results are presented below.
All pref testing done on my M2 MacBook Pro, running a Linux VM.
It's a release build without `--features testing`.

We see definitive improvement in ingest performance microbenchmark and
an ad-hoc microbenchmark for getpage against InMemoryLayer.

```
baseline: commit 7c74112 origin/main
HEAD: ef1c55c
```

<details>

```
cargo bench --bench bench_ingest -- 'ingest 128MB/100b seq, no delta'

baseline

ingest-small-values/ingest 128MB/100b seq, no delta
                        time:   [483.50 ms 498.73 ms 522.53 ms]
                        thrpt:  [244.96 MiB/s 256.65 MiB/s 264.73 MiB/s]

HEAD

ingest-small-values/ingest 128MB/100b seq, no delta
                        time:   [479.22 ms 482.92 ms 487.35 ms]
                        thrpt:  [262.64 MiB/s 265.06 MiB/s 267.10 MiB/s]
```

</details>

We don't have a micro-benchmark for InMemoryLayer and it's quite
cumbersome to add one. So, I did manual testing in `neon_local`.

<details>

```

  ./target/release/neon_local stop
  rm -rf .neon
  ./target/release/neon_local init
  ./target/release/neon_local start
  ./target/release/neon_local tenant create --set-default
  ./target/release/neon_local endpoint create foo
  ./target/release/neon_local endpoint start foo
  psql 'postgresql://cloud_admin@127.0.0.1:55432/postgres'
psql (13.16 (Debian 13.16-0+deb11u1), server 15.7)

CREATE TABLE wal_test (
    id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
    data TEXT
);

DO $$
DECLARE
    i INTEGER := 1;
BEGIN
    WHILE i <= 500000 LOOP
        INSERT INTO wal_test (data) VALUES ('data');
        i := i + 1;
    END LOOP;
END $$;

-- => result is one L0 from initdb and one 137M-sized ephemeral-2

DO $$
DECLARE
    i INTEGER := 1;
    random_id INTEGER;
    random_record wal_test%ROWTYPE;
    start_time TIMESTAMP := clock_timestamp();
    selects_completed INTEGER := 0;
    min_id INTEGER := 1;  -- Minimum ID value
    max_id INTEGER := 100000;  -- Maximum ID value, based on your insert range
    iters INTEGER := 100000000;  -- Number of iterations to run
BEGIN
    WHILE i <= iters LOOP
        -- Generate a random ID within the known range
        random_id := min_id + floor(random() * (max_id - min_id + 1))::int;

        -- Select the row with the generated random ID
        SELECT * INTO random_record
        FROM wal_test
        WHERE id = random_id;

        -- Increment the select counter
        selects_completed := selects_completed + 1;

        -- Check if a second has passed
        IF EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM clock_timestamp() - start_time) >= 1 THEN
            -- Print the number of selects completed in the last second
            RAISE NOTICE 'Selects completed in last second: %', selects_completed;

            -- Reset counters for the next second
            selects_completed := 0;
            start_time := clock_timestamp();
        END IF;

        -- Increment the loop counter
        i := i + 1;
    END LOOP;
END $$;

./target/release/neon_local stop

baseline: commit 7c74112 origin/main

NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1864
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1850
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1851
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1918
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1911
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1879
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1858
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1827
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1933

ours

NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1915
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1928
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1913
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1932
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1846
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1955
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1991
NOTICE:  Selects completed in last second: 1973
```

NB: the ephemeral file sizes differ by ca 1MiB, ours being 1MiB smaller.

</details>

# Rollout

This PR changes the code in-place and  is not gated by a feature flag.
@yliang412
Copy link
Contributor

yliang412 commented Sep 2, 2024

Last week:

This week:

@problame
Copy link
Contributor

problame commented Sep 4, 2024

Sync meeting:

  • ship 4c0a61d as a preliminary PR, to land in prod as part of next week's release
    • retain .freeze() and .slice() for uncompressed buffers
    • additional allocation for compressed buffers is ok
    • review from @problame and @arpad-m
  • continue feat(pageserver): newtype for dio-aligned buffer allocation #8730
    • actually do O_DIRECT (quick and dirty)
    • see if it works functionally (local test bench, regression test suite run)
    • some basic pagebench getpage-at-latest-lsn benchmarking
      • 100% PS pagecache hit rate, resize like prod config, or resize further and take a note
      • 100% virtualfile fd cache hit rate, resize like prod config
    • fix until not failures
    • => this demonstrates we can do O_DIRECT on the read path without errors, and we have a performance ballpark

Next steps after that:

@problame problame self-assigned this Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c/storage/pageserver Component: storage: pageserver t/feature Issue type: feature, for new features or requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants