Adding hardware test #351
Adding hardware test #351
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to two YAML configuration files for Azure DevOps pipelines. In Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AzureDevOps
participant Pipeline
User->>AzureDevOps: Push changes to branch
AzureDevOps->>Pipeline: Trigger pipeline based on branch activity
Pipeline->>Pipeline: Validate environment variables
Pipeline->>Pipeline: Trigger build and test
Pipeline->>Pipeline: Monitor pipeline run status
Pipeline->>User: Notify success or failure
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
azure-pipelines.yml (4)
51-57: LGTM! Consider fixing indentation.The introduction of the
appComponentsparameter enhances the pipeline's flexibility by allowing dynamic specification of test components. This is a good practice for maintaining a configurable and reusable pipeline.Consider adjusting the indentation to align with YAML best practices:
parameters: - name: appComponents displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on type: object default: - XIAO_ESP32C3 - ESP32_C3_REV3🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
59-90: LGTM! Consider addressing minor formatting issues.The introduction of a staged approach with a dedicated
Buildstage improves the pipeline's structure and readability. The use of templates for class library build and error reporting promotes code reuse and maintainability. The new artifact publishing task ensures that build outputs are available for subsequent stages or manual download, which is a good practice.Consider addressing the following minor formatting issues:
- Adjust indentation for improved readability and YAML best practices.
- Remove trailing spaces on lines 80 and 96.
Example of corrected indentation:
stages: - stage: Build displayName: 'Build' jobs: - job: Build displayName: 'Build job' pool: vmImage: 'windows-latest' steps: - template: azure-pipelines-templates/class-lib-build.yml@templates parameters: sonarCloudProject: 'nanoframework_lib-nanoFramework.Json' runUnitTests: true unitTestRunsettings: '$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)\.runsettings' - template: azure-pipelines-templates/discord-webhook-task.yml@templates parameters: status: 'failure' webhookUrl: '$(DiscordWebhook)' message: '' - task: PublishPipelineArtifact@1 displayName: Publish Pipeline Artifact copy inputs: path: '$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)' artifactName: 'Artifacts'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
92-97: LGTM! Consider parameterizingunitTestRunsettingsand fix formatting.The introduction of a loop to iterate over
appComponentsis an excellent approach. It allows for dynamic execution of device tests, increasing flexibility and reducing redundancy in the pipeline configuration.Consider parameterizing the
unitTestRunsettingsto allow for more flexibility:parameters: - name: unitTestRunsettings type: string default: 'nanoFramework.Json.Test\nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test\bin\Debug\nanoFramework.System.Text.dll' # ... (in the loop section) - ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}: - template: azure-pipelines-templates/device-test.yml parameters: appComponents: ${{ appComponents }} unitTestRunsettings: ${{ parameters.unitTestRunsettings }}Also, please address the following formatting issues:
- Remove trailing spaces on lines 92 and 96.
- Adjust indentation for improved readability.
- Ensure there's a new line character at the end of the file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
1-97: Great improvements overall! Consider a final formatting pass.The restructuring of this Azure Pipelines configuration file is a significant improvement. The introduction of parameters, stages, and the loop for device testing enhances the pipeline's flexibility, reusability, and maintainability. The consistent use of templates for reusable components is also a great practice.
To further improve the file's readability and adhere to YAML best practices, consider doing a final formatting pass to address the following:
- Ensure consistent indentation throughout the file (2 spaces for each level is standard for YAML).
- Remove all trailing spaces.
- Add a new line character at the end of the file.
You can use a YAML linter or your IDE's formatting tools to help with these adjustments.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
azure-pipelines.yml
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
azure-pipelines.yml (5)
51-57: Approve the addition of parameters with a minor indentation fix.The introduction of the
appComponentsparameter enhances the pipeline's flexibility, allowing for dynamic specification of test components. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding hardware testing capabilities.To address the YAML linting warning, please adjust the indentation of the
parameterssection. Apply this diff:-parameters: -- name: appComponents - displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on - type: object - default: - - XIAO_ESP32C3 - - ESP32_C3_REV3 +parameters: + - name: appComponents + displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on + type: object + default: + - XIAO_ESP32C3 + - ESP32_C3_REV3🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
59-67: Approve the introduction of stages with a minor indentation fix.The addition of the
stagessection with aBuildstage and job improves the pipeline's structure and readability. This change aligns with best practices for Azure Pipelines and ensures a consistent build environment.To address the YAML linting warning, please adjust the indentation of the
stagessection. Apply this diff:-stages: -- stage: Build - displayName: 'Build' - jobs: - - job: Build - displayName: 'Build job' - pool: - # default is the following VM Image - vmImage: 'windows-latest' +stages: + - stage: Build + displayName: 'Build' + jobs: + - job: Build + displayName: 'Build job' + pool: + # default is the following VM Image + vmImage: 'windows-latest'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
70-85: Approve the reorganized build steps with a minor formatting fix.The reorganization of build steps within the
Buildjob, using templates for class library build and error reporting, promotes code reuse and maintainability. The inclusion of SonarCloud analysis and unit tests enhances code quality checks, which is commendable.To address the YAML linting error, please remove the trailing space from line 80. Apply this diff:
- - template: azure-pipelines-templates/discord-webhook-task.yml@templates + - template: azure-pipelines-templates/discord-webhook-task.yml@templates🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
86-90: Approve artifact publishing with optimization suggestion.The addition of the artifact publishing step is crucial for sharing build outputs between jobs or for archiving purposes. This is a good practice in CI/CD pipelines.
Consider optimizing the artifact content by specifying only the necessary files or directories instead of publishing the entire working directory. This can reduce storage usage and improve artifact download times. For example:
- task: PublishPipelineArtifact@1 displayName: Publish Pipeline Artifact inputs: path: '$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)' artifact: 'BuildOutputs'Ensure to copy only the required files to the
$(Build.ArtifactStagingDirectory)before this step.
92-97: Approve the device testing loop with minor formatting fixes.The addition of the loop to iterate over
appComponentsand execute device tests using thedevice-test.ymltemplate is an excellent implementation. This dynamic approach aligns perfectly with the PR objective of adding hardware testing capabilities.To address the YAML linting errors, please apply the following fixes:
- Remove trailing spaces from lines 92 and 96.
- Add a newline at the end of the file.
Apply this diff:
-- ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}: +- ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}: - template: azure-pipelines-templates/device-test.yml@templates parameters: appComponents: ${{ appComponents }} - unitTestRunsettings: + unitTestRunsettings: - 'nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/Release/nanoFramework.System.Text.dll' +🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark/nanoFramework.Json.Benchmark.nfprojis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
azure-pipelines.yml
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-97: Overall approval with minor formatting suggestions.The changes to the
azure-pipelines.ymlfile significantly enhance the pipeline's flexibility and align well with the PR objective of adding hardware testing capabilities. The introduction of parameters, stages, and the device testing loop are particularly noteworthy improvements.Key points:
- The
appComponentsparameter allows for dynamic specification of test components.- The introduction of stages improves the pipeline's structure and readability.
- The device testing loop enables efficient execution of tests across multiple hardware components.
While the overall structure and content of the changes are excellent, please address the minor formatting issues mentioned in the previous comments to ensure consistency and adhere to YAML best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
azure-pipelines.yml (5)
51-57: Approve the addition ofappComponentsparameter with a minor formatting suggestion.The introduction of the
appComponentsparameter aligns well with the PR objective of adding hardware testing capabilities. It provides a flexible way to specify the components for testing.However, there's a minor formatting issue:
Please adjust the indentation of the parameter section. Each item should be indented with 2 spaces. Here's the corrected version:
parameters: - name: appComponents displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on type: object default: - XIAO_ESP32C3 - ESP32_C3_REV3🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
59-68: Approve the introduction of stages with a minor formatting suggestion.The addition of the
stagessection with aBuildstage and job improves the pipeline's structure and readability. This change aligns with best practices for Azure Pipelines.However, there's a minor formatting issue:
Please adjust the indentation of the stages section. Each level should be indented with 2 spaces. Here's the corrected version:
stages: - stage: Build displayName: 'Build' jobs: - job: Build displayName: 'Build job' pool: # default is the following VM Image vmImage: 'windows-latest'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
70-85: Approve the build steps with a minor formatting suggestion.The encapsulation of build steps within the
Buildjob and the use of templates for class library build and error reporting are excellent practices. The addition ofrunUnitTestsandunitTestRunsettingsparameters aligns well with the PR objective of adding testing capabilities.However, there's a minor formatting issue:
Please remove the trailing space from line 80. Here's the corrected line:
- template: azure-pipelines-templates/discord-webhook-task.yml@templates🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
92-97: Approve the addition of device testing with minor formatting suggestions.The introduction of the device testing section using a loop to iterate over
appComponentsis an excellent implementation of the PR objective. This approach allows for flexible and extensible testing of multiple hardware components.However, there are a few minor formatting issues:
- Remove the trailing spaces from lines 92 and 96.
- Add a newline character at the end of the file.
Here's the corrected version:
- ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}: - template: azure-pipelines-templates/device-test.yml@templates parameters: appComponents: ${{ appComponents }} unitTestRunsettings: - 'nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/Release/NFUnitTest.dll'Note the added newline at the end.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
Line range hint
1-97: Overall approval with offer for further assistance.The changes to
azure-pipelines.ymlare well-structured and align perfectly with the PR objective of adding hardware testing capabilities. The introduction of theappComponentsparameter, the restructuring into stages, and the addition of device testing demonstrate a significant improvement in the pipeline's flexibility and functionality.While there were some minor formatting issues (mainly indentation and trailing spaces), these do not detract from the overall quality of the changes. The use of templates, the addition of artifact publishing, and the loop for device testing are all excellent practices that enhance the pipeline's maintainability and extensibility.
If you'd like any assistance in further optimizing the pipeline or addressing the minor formatting issues, please let me know. I'd be happy to help generate a script to automatically fix the formatting or suggest any additional enhancements to the pipeline structure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- azure-pipelines.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
azure-pipelines.yml
[warning] 52-52: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 60-60: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 63-63: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 72-72: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 80-80: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 92-92: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 93-93: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 96-96: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 97-97: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)
86-90: Approve the addition of artifact publishing step.The inclusion of the
PublishPipelineArtifact@1task is a valuable addition to the pipeline. This step ensures that build artifacts are preserved and can be used in subsequent pipeline stages or for debugging purposes, which aligns with CI/CD best practices.
|
Couple of things to improve in the device-test.yml template:
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
azure-pipelines.yml (1)
40-71: Fix YAML indentation and enhance path handling.The build configuration is solid, but there are some improvements needed:
- Fix indentation according to YAML best practices
- Consider using path variables for cross-platform compatibility (PR comment about Linux paths)
Apply these fixes:
stages: - stage: Build displayName: 'Build' jobs: - job: Build displayName: 'Build job' steps: - template: azure-pipelines-templates/class-lib-build.yml@templates parameters: sonarCloudProject: 'nanoframework_lib-nanoFramework.Json' runUnitTests: true - unitTestRunsettings: '$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)\.runsettings' + unitTestRunsettings: '$(System.DefaultWorkingDirectory)/.runsettings'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 41-41: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 44-44: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 53-53: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
azure-bootstrap.yml (2)
4-26: Consider adding explicit path includes for hardware test files.While the path exclusions are well-defined, consider adding explicit path includes to ensure the pipeline only triggers for changes related to hardware testing. This would prevent unnecessary builds for unrelated changes.
trigger: branches: include: - main - develop - release-* paths: + include: + - tests/hardware/** + - device-tests/** exclude:
1-169: Fix YAML formatting issues.There are several formatting inconsistencies in the file:
- Incorrect indentation at lines 28, 40
- Trailing spaces at lines 37, 39, 98, 128, 131
- Missing newline at end of file
Please run
yamllintlocally and fix these formatting issues.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 28-28: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[error] 37-37: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 39-39: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 40-40: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 98-98: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 128-128: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 131-131: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 169-169: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettingsis excluded by none and included by none
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
azure-bootstrap.yml(1 hunks)azure-pipelines.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
azure-bootstrap.yml
[warning] 28-28: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[error] 37-37: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 39-39: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 40-40: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 98-98: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 128-128: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 131-131: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 169-169: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
azure-pipelines.yml
[warning] 34-34: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 41-41: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
[warning] 44-44: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[warning] 53-53: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4
(indentation)
[error] 61-61: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 73-73: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 74-74: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 77-77: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 78-78: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
| - ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}: | ||
| - template: azure-pipelines-templates/device-test.yml@templates | ||
| parameters: | ||
| appComponents: ${{ appComponents }} | ||
| unitTestRunsettings: | ||
| - 'nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/Release/NFUnitTest.dll' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve cross-platform compatibility and test validation.
The device test configuration needs improvements to address the path handling issues mentioned in PR comments:
- Use forward slashes for cross-platform compatibility
- Add test file existence validation
- Remove trailing spaces
Apply these changes:
- ${{ each appComponents in parameters.appComponents }}:
- template: azure-pipelines-templates/device-test.yml@templates
parameters:
appComponents: ${{ appComponents }}
- unitTestRunsettings:
- - 'nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/Release/NFUnitTest.dll'
+ unitTestRunsettings:
+ - 'nanoFramework.Json.Test/nano.runsettings,nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/$(buildConfiguration)/NFUnitTest.dll'Add a validation step before running tests:
- task: PowerShell@2
displayName: 'Validate Test Files'
inputs:
targetType: 'inline'
script: |
$testPath = "nanoFramework.Json.Test/bin/$(buildConfiguration)/NFUnitTest.dll"
if (-not (Test-Path $testPath)) {
Write-Error "Test assembly not found: $testPath"
exit 1
}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 73-73: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[warning] 74-74: wrong indentation: expected 4 but found 2
(indentation)
[error] 77-77: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 78-78: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
| parameters: | ||
| - name: appComponents | ||
| displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on | ||
| type: object | ||
| default: | ||
| - none | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve parameter configuration and validation.
The default value of none for appComponents could lead to scenarios where no tests are executed, which aligns with the reported issue in PR comments about catching missing tests.
Consider these improvements:
- Add parameter validation to prevent empty or 'none' values
- Enhance the parameter description to list valid component options
- Add a minimum number of required components
Here's a suggested improvement:
parameters:
- name: appComponents
displayName: List of capabilities to run the tests on
type: object
+ # List of valid components: [component1, component2, ...]
+ # At least one component must be specified
default:
- - none
+ - required: true
+ - allowed:
+ - component1
+ - component2Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[warning] 34-34: wrong indentation: expected 2 but found 0
(indentation)
| # The Pipeline is going to be called by the GitHub action. | ||
| # Manual trigger is always possible. | ||
| trigger: none | ||
| pr: none |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
The pipeline is configured to be triggered by a GitHub Action, but no workflow files currently integrate with Azure Pipelines. This could lead to the pipeline never being triggered as intended.
.github/workflows/pr-checks.ymlonly runs package checks.github/workflows/update-dependencies.ymlonly handles dependency updates- No workflow file contains integration with
azure-pipelines.yml
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify GitHub Action integration.
The trigger configuration is correct for external invocation. The comments clearly explain the pipeline's execution context.
Let's verify the GitHub Action integration:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for GitHub Action workflow files that trigger this pipeline
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows --exec grep -l "azure-pipelines"
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for GitHub workflow files and Azure Pipeline references
# First, find all workflow files
echo "=== GitHub Workflow Files ==="
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows
# Then, search for any Azure Pipeline related patterns in yaml/yml files
echo -e "\n=== Files referencing Azure Pipelines ==="
rg -l -g "*.{yml,yaml}" -i "azure.?pipeline|azure.?devops" .
Length of output: 388
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of pr-checks.yml to see if it triggers azure-pipelines
echo "=== Content of pr-checks.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/pr-checks.yml
# Also check update-dependencies.yml just to be thorough
echo -e "\n=== Content of update-dependencies.yml ==="
cat .github/workflows/update-dependencies.yml
Length of output: 1366
| variables: | ||
| AZURE_DEVOPS_ORG: nanoFramework | ||
| AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECT: nanoFramework.Json | ||
| AZURE_DEVOPS_PIPELINE_ID: 59 | ||
| AZURE_POOL_NAME: TestStream | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider parameterizing pipeline configuration.
The hardcoded values for organization, project, pipeline ID, and pool name reduce reusability. Consider moving these to pipeline variables or parameters that can be configured at runtime.
parameters:
- name: azureDevOpsOrg
type: string
default: nanoFramework
- name: azureDevOpsProject
type: string
default: nanoFramework.Json
- name: pipelineId
type: number
default: 59
- name: poolName
type: string
default: TestStream
variables:
AZURE_DEVOPS_ORG: ${{ parameters.azureDevOpsOrg }}
AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECT: ${{ parameters.azureDevOpsProject }}
AZURE_DEVOPS_PIPELINE_ID: ${{ parameters.pipelineId }}
AZURE_POOL_NAME: ${{ parameters.poolName }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 37-37: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| branch="${BUILD_SOURCEBRANCH}" | ||
|
|
||
| # Encode the PAT | ||
| patEncoded=$(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Avoid base64 encoding PAT in script.
Base64 encoding the PAT in the script makes it vulnerable to logging. Consider using Azure DevOps predefined variables or a secure task for authentication.
- patEncoded=$(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64)
+ # Use System.AccessToken or az devops loginCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| # Get the pool ID | ||
| url="https://dev.azure.com/${organization}/_apis/distributedtask/pools?poolName=${poolName}&api-version=7.1" | ||
| AZP_POOL_AGENTS=$(curl -s "${headers[@]}" -X GET "$url") | ||
| poolId=$(echo "$AZP_POOL_AGENTS" | jq -r '.value[0].id') | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Pool ID: $poolId" | ||
|
|
||
| # Define the URL to get all agents in the pool | ||
| url="https://dev.azure.com/${organization}/_apis/distributedtask/pools/${poolId}/agents?includeCapabilities=true&api-version=7.1" | ||
|
|
||
| response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" "${headers[@]}" -X GET "$url") | ||
| http_code=${response: -3} | ||
| content=${response::-3} | ||
|
|
||
| if [ $http_code -eq 200 ]; then | ||
| # Extract all userCapabilities names for online and enabled agents as a unique list | ||
| capabilityNames=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '[.value[] | select(.status == "online" and .enabled == true) | .userCapabilities | keys] | unique | flatten | join("\n- ")') | ||
| else | ||
| echo "Failed to retrieve agent capabilities. HTTP Status Code: $http_code" | ||
| echo "Response: \"$content\"" | ||
| exit 1 | ||
| fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout and retry mechanism for API calls.
The API calls to fetch pool information lack timeout and retry mechanisms, which could lead to pipeline hangs or failures due to transient issues.
+ # Function to retry API calls
+ function retry_curl() {
+ local retries=3
+ local wait=5
+ local timeout=30
+ local i=0
+ while [ $i -lt $retries ]; do
+ response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" --connect-timeout $timeout "${headers[@]}" "$@")
+ if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
+ return 0
+ fi
+ i=$((i+1))
+ [ $i -lt $retries ] && sleep $wait
+ done
+ return 1
+ }
+
# Get the pool ID
url="https://dev.azure.com/${organization}/_apis/distributedtask/pools?poolName=${poolName}&api-version=7.1"
- AZP_POOL_AGENTS=$(curl -s "${headers[@]}" -X GET "$url")
+ if ! retry_curl -X GET "$url"; then
+ echo "Failed to get pool ID after retries"
+ exit 1
+ fiCommittable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| - script: | | ||
| echo "Pipeline to monitor Run ID: $(run_id)" | ||
| # Define the URL to get the pipeline run status | ||
| url="https://dev.azure.com/${AZURE_DEVOPS_ORG}/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECT}/_apis/pipelines/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PIPELINE_ID}/runs/$(run_id)?api-version=7.1" | ||
|
|
||
| # Loop to monitor the pipeline run status | ||
| while true; do | ||
| response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Basic $(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64)" -X GET "$url") | ||
| http_code=${response: -3} | ||
| content=${response::-3} | ||
|
|
||
| if [ $http_code -eq 200 ]; then | ||
| state=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.state') | ||
| result=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.result') | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Pipeline run state: $state" | ||
|
|
||
| if [ "$state" == "completed" ]; then | ||
| echo "Pipeline run completed with result: $result" | ||
| if [ "$result" == "succeeded" ]; then | ||
| exit 0 | ||
| else | ||
| exit 1 | ||
| fi | ||
| fi | ||
| else | ||
| echo "Failed to get pipeline run status. HTTP Status Code: $http_code" | ||
| echo "Response: $content" | ||
| exit 1 | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| # Wait for a while before checking again | ||
| sleep 30 | ||
| done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve pipeline monitoring robustness.
The current monitoring implementation has several potential issues:
- No maximum wait time could lead to infinite execution
- Fixed sleep interval isn't optimal for long-running tests
- Basic error handling could miss edge cases
+ # Configuration
+ max_wait_time=7200 # 2 hours
+ start_time=$SECONDS
+ initial_sleep=30
+ max_sleep=300 # 5 minutes
+ current_sleep=$initial_sleep
+
# Loop to monitor the pipeline run status
while true; do
+ # Check if maximum wait time exceeded
+ elapsed=$(( SECONDS - start_time ))
+ if [ $elapsed -gt $max_wait_time ]; then
+ echo "Pipeline monitoring timed out after $(( max_wait_time / 60 )) minutes"
+ exit 1
+ fi
+
response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Basic $(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64)" -X GET "$url")
http_code=${response: -3}
content=${response::-3}
if [ $http_code -eq 200 ]; then
state=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.state')
result=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.result')
echo "Pipeline run state: $state"
if [ "$state" == "completed" ]; then
echo "Pipeline run completed with result: $result"
if [ "$result" == "succeeded" ]; then
exit 0
else
exit 1
fi
+ elif [ "$state" == "canceling" ] || [ "$state" == "canceled" ]; then
+ echo "Pipeline was canceled"
+ exit 1
fi
else
echo "Failed to get pipeline run status. HTTP Status Code: $http_code"
echo "Response: $content"
exit 1
fi
- # Wait for a while before checking again
- sleep 30
+ # Exponential backoff with maximum limit
+ sleep $current_sleep
+ current_sleep=$(( current_sleep * 2 ))
+ [ $current_sleep -gt $max_sleep ] && current_sleep=$max_sleep
done📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - script: | | |
| echo "Pipeline to monitor Run ID: $(run_id)" | |
| # Define the URL to get the pipeline run status | |
| url="https://dev.azure.com/${AZURE_DEVOPS_ORG}/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECT}/_apis/pipelines/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PIPELINE_ID}/runs/$(run_id)?api-version=7.1" | |
| # Loop to monitor the pipeline run status | |
| while true; do | |
| response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Basic $(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64)" -X GET "$url") | |
| http_code=${response: -3} | |
| content=${response::-3} | |
| if [ $http_code -eq 200 ]; then | |
| state=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.state') | |
| result=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.result') | |
| echo "Pipeline run state: $state" | |
| if [ "$state" == "completed" ]; then | |
| echo "Pipeline run completed with result: $result" | |
| if [ "$result" == "succeeded" ]; then | |
| exit 0 | |
| else | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| fi | |
| else | |
| echo "Failed to get pipeline run status. HTTP Status Code: $http_code" | |
| echo "Response: $content" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| # Wait for a while before checking again | |
| sleep 30 | |
| done | |
| - script: | | |
| echo "Pipeline to monitor Run ID: $(run_id)" | |
| # Define the URL to get the pipeline run status | |
| url="https://dev.azure.com/${AZURE_DEVOPS_ORG}/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PROJECT}/_apis/pipelines/${AZURE_DEVOPS_PIPELINE_ID}/runs/$(run_id)?api-version=7.1" | |
| # Configuration | |
| max_wait_time=7200 # 2 hours | |
| start_time=$SECONDS | |
| initial_sleep=30 | |
| max_sleep=300 # 5 minutes | |
| current_sleep=$initial_sleep | |
| # Loop to monitor the pipeline run status | |
| while true; do | |
| # Check if maximum wait time exceeded | |
| elapsed=$(( SECONDS - start_time )) | |
| if [ $elapsed -gt $max_wait_time ]; then | |
| echo "Pipeline monitoring timed out after $(( max_wait_time / 60 )) minutes" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| response=$(curl -s -w "%{http_code}" -H "Authorization: Basic $(echo -n ":${AZURE_DEVOPS_PAT}" | base64)" -X GET "$url") | |
| http_code=${response: -3} | |
| content=${response::-3} | |
| if [ $http_code -eq 200 ]; then | |
| state=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.state') | |
| result=$(echo "$content" | jq -r '.result') | |
| echo "Pipeline run state: $state" | |
| if [ "$state" == "completed" ]; then | |
| echo "Pipeline run completed with result: $result" | |
| if [ "$result" == "succeeded" ]; then | |
| exit 0 | |
| else | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| elif [ "$state" == "canceling" ] || [ "$state" == "canceled" ]; then | |
| echo "Pipeline was canceled" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| else | |
| echo "Failed to get pipeline run status. HTTP Status Code: $http_code" | |
| echo "Response: $content" | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| # Exponential backoff with maximum limit | |
| sleep $current_sleep | |
| current_sleep=$(( current_sleep * 2 )) | |
| [ $current_sleep -gt $max_sleep ] && current_sleep=$max_sleep | |
| done |
Description
Adding hardware test
Motivation and Context
How Has This Been Tested?
With this PR pipeline
Screenshots
Types of changes
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
appComponentsfor enhanced configurability of testing components.Bug Fixes
Refactor