Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate mitmproxy #53

Open
JeremyRand opened this issue Jan 5, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Integrate mitmproxy #53

JeremyRand opened this issue Jan 5, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@JeremyRand
Copy link
Member

JeremyRand commented Jan 5, 2015

Integrate a proxy server using mitmproxy. Hopefully this will make Convergence unnecessary.

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/7483411-integrate-mitmproxy?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F435873&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F435873&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).
@JeremyRand
Copy link
Member Author

In #34 @indolering said the following: "Shouldn't our proxy software use the RPC interface? I doubt that, for example, Tor would use mitmproxy."

@indolering In my testing, doing a single RPC call has an overhead on the order of 2ms (note that loading a website will require multiple RPC calls -- 5 RPC calls is not out of the question). I believe (though I haven't tested) that integrating mitmproxy as an NMControl service will be much faster than that. It doesn't matter for Tor's purposes -- if they don't want to use mitmproxy, then they can just not enable that service.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant