Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #2450]Add Algolia Crawler Github Action #2451

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Jan 31, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #2450

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Integrated Algolia crawler into the site deployment workflow
    • Enhanced search capabilities for the website
  • Chores

    • Updated GitHub Actions workflow configuration

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for Jekyll site deployment by adding an Algolia crawler step. The new step integrates the Algolia crawler action with specific input parameters using secret-based authentication. The workflow's core structure remains unchanged, with the primary enhancement being the incorporation of Algolia crawler functionality to potentially improve site search capabilities.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml Added Algolia crawler step to deployment job with secret-based configuration

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add Algolia Crawler Github Action [#2450]

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

feature🚀, auto merge, ready to review, waiting-review, AI review first

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN
  • rocketmq-rust-bot

Poem

🚀 Algolia's crawler takes flight,
Through GitHub's workflow, search burns bright
Secrets whisper, actions dance
Indexing magic at a glance
A rabbit's search is now complete! 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

@rocketmq-rust-robot rocketmq-rust-robot added the feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project. label Jan 31, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (2)

63-63: Consider making the site URL configurable.

The hardcoded site URL 'https://rocketmq-rust.ljbmxsm.com' could be problematic for maintenance. Consider making it configurable through:

  • A repository secret
  • A GitHub environment variable
  • The workflow_dispatch inputs
-          site-url: 'https://rocketmq-rust.ljbmxsm.com'
+          site-url: ${{ secrets.SITE_URL }}

55-62: Add error handling and secret verification.

The Algolia crawler step could benefit from additional robustness:

  1. Verify required secrets exist
  2. Add error handling for crawler failures
  3. Consider making the step conditional based on environment
       - name: Algolia crawler creation and crawl
+        if: ${{ env.DEPLOY_ENV == 'production' }}
         uses: algolia/algoliasearch-crawler-github-actions@v1.0.10
         id: algolia_crawler
+        continue-on-error: true
         with: #https://github.com/marketplace/actions/algolia-crawler-automatic-crawl
+          # Fail fast if secrets are missing
+          pre-validation: |
+            if [[ -z "${{ secrets.CRAWLER_USER_ID }}" ]] || 
+               [[ -z "${{ secrets.CRAWLER_API_KEY }}" ]] ||
+               [[ -z "${{ secrets.ALGOLIA_APP_ID }}" ]] ||
+               [[ -z "${{ secrets.ALGOLIA_API_KEY }}" ]]; then
+              echo "Required secrets are missing"
+              exit 1
+            fi
           crawler-user-id: ${{ secrets.CRAWLER_USER_ID }}
           crawler-api-key: ${{ secrets.CRAWLER_API_KEY }}
           algolia-app-id: ${{ secrets.ALGOLIA_APP_ID }}
           algolia-api-key: ${{ secrets.ALGOLIA_API_KEY }}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2bd684e and c4e94cd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/jekyll-gh-pages.yml (2)

7-8: LGTM! Well-structured trigger configuration.

The workflow is correctly configured to trigger only when documentation files are changed in the main branch.


55-63: Please verify the crawler integration.

Since no testing details were provided in the PR:

  1. Verify that the crawler successfully indexes your documentation
  2. Confirm that crawler failures don't affect the main site deployment
  3. Test the search functionality after deployment

Would you like me to help create a test plan or documentation for verifying the Algolia integration?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.63%. Comparing base (2bd684e) to head (c4e94cd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2451   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   28.63%   28.63%           
=======================================
  Files         510      510           
  Lines       73487    73487           
=======================================
  Hits        21044    21044           
  Misses      52443    52443           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AI review first Ai review pr first approved PR has approved auto merge feature🚀 Suggest an idea for this project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature🚀] Add Algolia Crawler Github Action
3 participants