incorrect diameters or surface-brightness profiles in SGA-2020

[moustakas]

Related to #48, let's track galaxies with incorrect diameters or surface-brightness profiles here so they can be checked in the next version of the atlas.

From #60 (comment):

• NGC 55 + IC1537 - SGA ellipse is not big enough and misses fluxes
• NGC253 - SGA ellipse not big enough
• NGC4406 + NGC4402 - SGA ellipses look small
• NGC4472 - SGA ellipse looks small
  IC5152 - SGA ellipse looks ok but wrong axis ratio

[moustakas]

The following objects are in globular clusters and have over-estimated; they probably should be removed from the next SGA version:

• https://sga.legacysurvey.org/group/DR8-3225p122-20657_GROUP
• DR8-2056p285-107 - https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=205.5741&dec=28.4906&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=15&sga&sga-parent
• DR8-2056p285-12718 - https://www.legacysurvey.org/viewer?ra=205.5532&dec=28.4685&layer=ls-dr9&zoom=14&sga-parent&sga

[TriShotFlurry]

DDO113 should be redone
Group: DDO113
RA Dec=183.742033 36.218418
D(26)=1.656 arcmin, b/a=0.67, PA=45.0 deg
Type: dIrr , Redshift=0.0009

[TriShotFlurry]

UGC07559
Group: UGC07559
RA Dec=186.772328 37.143684
D(26)=3.548 arcmin, b/a=0.65, PA=145.5 deg
Type: I , Redshift=0.0007
Very underestimated diameter and LEDA is truly accurate

[TriShotFlurry]

The galaxy is significantly overestimated due to big galaxy
NGC2694
Group: NGC2693_GROUP
RA Dec=134.246940 51.331944
D(26)=2.163 arcmin, b/a=0.69, PA=68.2 deg
Type: E , Redshift=0.0169