Skip to content

[LINK-2174] add support for authnMethod config #110

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022
Merged

[LINK-2174] add support for authnMethod config #110

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022

Conversation

mt-gdiniz
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@mt-max mt-max left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please review the code among the pair first to filter out simple mistakes before asking for external review.

mt-max
mt-max previously approved these changes Nov 17, 2022
mt-max
mt-max previously approved these changes Nov 17, 2022
mt-rsobachi
mt-rsobachi previously approved these changes Nov 18, 2022
Copy link

@awe-mt awe-mt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A couple of questions.

  • What is samlSubjectId? Is that required for SSO?
  • How much complexity does it add for you to support preferredAuthenticationMethod being an array? I think, as it is currently implemented, it does not make sense for it to be an array. I'd like to argue for changing that before we release it to our clients.

@mt-gdiniz mt-gdiniz dismissed stale reviews from mt-rsobachi and mt-max via b588203 November 18, 2022 03:21
mt-rsobachi
mt-rsobachi previously approved these changes Nov 21, 2022
Co-authored-by: Roberto Sobachi <112455597+mt-rsobachi@users.noreply.github.com>
@mt-gdiniz mt-gdiniz merged commit bc6240c into moneytree:master Nov 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants