You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary:
The names of the folders inside the mojaloop/testing-toolkit-test-cases repo are confusing, which makes it hard for contributors to understand the intentions of the tests and add new tests.
We should have well established and consistent names for all of our tests!
other-bug-fixes.json we shouldn't use the word 'other' it's too vauge
Test for Bugfix #1378 and other Test for ... - this is a repo full of test cases, we can drop the Test for prefix /other_tests/ - what does other mean?
new_changes - what are new changes? Are they different from v1.1_changes?
at what point do v1.1_changes get integrated into the golden path? newsetcgs.json makes no sense to me, we can't use words like 'new' as they have very little meaning
p2p_on_us_transfers is this a feature?
in general, we should have consistent cases use of - , and _, etc. For example we have the following directories: api-tests, bug fixes, feature_tests - if we standardize on using _ and drop the redundant tests, these should be api, bug_fixes, features`
I hope you can agree that we need to tidy the names and conventions for our test cases to make them more manageable.
Severity:
(Low, Medium, High)
Priority:
(Critical, Medium, Low)
Expected Behavior
Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
3.
Specifications
Component (if known):
Version:
Platform:
Subsystem:
Type of testing:
Bug found/raised by:
Notes:
Severity when opened:
Priority when opened:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lewisdaly
added
the
bug
Something isn't working or it has wrong behavior on a Mojaloop Core service
label
Dec 7, 2021
hi @lewisdaly - it was a translation from legacy postman collections so the team used the same conventions to avoid confusion and help teams that are comparing test cases..
We can change these soon; I would avoid using words such as "Poor" in the titles though, personally
Summary:
The names of the folders inside the mojaloop/testing-toolkit-test-cases repo are confusing, which makes it hard for contributors to understand the intentions of the tests and add new tests.
We should have well established and consistent names for all of our tests!
For example:
other-bug-fixes.json
we shouldn't use the word 'other' it's too vaugeTest for Bugfix #1378
and otherTest for ...
- this is a repo full of test cases, we can drop theTest for
prefix/other_tests/
- what doesother
mean?new_changes
- what are new changes? Are they different fromv1.1_changes?
v1.1_changes
get integrated into the golden path?newsetcgs.json
makes no sense to me, we can't use words like 'new' as they have very little meaningp2p_on_us_transfers
is this a feature?in general, we should have consistent cases use of
and
-
,_
, etc. For example we have the following directories:api-tests
,bug fixes
,feature_tests
- if we standardize on using_
and drop the redundanttests
, these should beapi
, bug_fixes,
features`I hope you can agree that we need to tidy the names and conventions for our test cases to make them more manageable.
Severity:
(Low, Medium, High)
Priority:
(Critical, Medium, Low)
Expected Behavior
Steps to Reproduce
1.
2.
3.
Specifications
Notes:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: