Skip to content

Enhancement to support IProgress #111

Closed
@Tyler-R-Kendrick

Description

@Tyler-R-Kendrick

According to the spec:
When a party wants to receive progress updates for a request, it includes a
progressToken in the request metadata.

  • Progress tokens MUST be a string or integer value
  • Progress tokens can be chosen by the sender using any means, but MUST be unique
    across all active requests.
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "some_method",
  "params": {
    "_meta": {
      "progressToken": "abc123"
    }
  }
}

The receiver MAY then send progress notifications containing:

  • The original progress token
  • The current progress value so far
  • An optional "total" value
{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "notifications/progress",
  "params": {
    "progressToken": "abc123",
    "progress": 50,
    "total": 100
  }
}
  • The progress value MUST increase with each notification, even if the total is
    unknown.
  • The progress and the total values MAY be floating point.

Behavior Requirements

  1. Progress notifications MUST only reference tokens that:

    • Were provided in an active request
    • Are associated with an in-progress operation
  2. Receivers of progress requests MAY:

    • Choose not to send any progress notifications
    • Send notifications at whatever frequency they deem appropriate
    • Omit the total value if unknown
sequenceDiagram
    participant Sender
    participant Receiver

    Note over Sender,Receiver: Request with progress token
    Sender->>Receiver: Method request with progressToken

    Note over Sender,Receiver: Progress updates
    loop Progress Updates
        Receiver-->>Sender: Progress notification (0.2/1.0)
        Receiver-->>Sender: Progress notification (0.6/1.0)
        Receiver-->>Sender: Progress notification (1.0/1.0)
    end

    Note over Sender,Receiver: Operation complete
    Receiver->>Sender: Method response
Loading

Implementation Notes

  • Senders and receivers SHOULD track active progress tokens
  • Both parties SHOULD implement rate limiting to prevent flooding
  • Progress notifications MUST stop after completion

Suggestions for implementation

To implement, it seems that all operations need to be tracked with an Id so that progress notifications can be sent. This behavior likely needs to be implemented for all operations. Since the protocol allows for extensible operation definitions, there should likely be a central way to register tasks for execution that manages the core protocol behaviors (cancel & progress).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

enhancementNew feature or request

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions