Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

learner API: new function predict_trace #50

Open
berndbischl opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 5 comments
Open

learner API: new function predict_trace #50

berndbischl opened this issue Jul 9, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@berndbischl
Copy link
Member

many learners have a "sequence" parameter so you can get full trace from a single training run.

e.g. ntree, boosting rounds, or the "s" param in glmnet

this is should be supported.

basically we need to allow to "mark up" one hyperparam in the set, with a tag.
and then maybe not have a new predict_trace function but handle this in the normal predict

@jakob-r
Copy link
Member

jakob-r commented Jul 9, 2019

Proposal: tag the Param with "sequential"

@berndbischl
Copy link
Member Author

Proposal: tag the Param with "sequential"

that is not very precise, and debatable whether the "s" param in glmnet falls under it
tag = "predict_trace" or "predict_sequential" ?

@jakob-r
Copy link
Member

jakob-r commented Jul 11, 2019

Then the Param would have the tags "train" , "predict" and "predict_sequential", right?

@mb706 mb706 transferred this issue from mlr-org/mlr3 Jul 11, 2019
@mb706
Copy link
Collaborator

mb706 commented Jul 11, 2019

I think the current "predict" tag is actually enough, but we would have to adjust tuning to handle predict-time-only parameters efficiently

@berndbischl
Copy link
Member Author

I think the current "predict" tag is actually enough, but we would have to adjust tuning to handle predict-time-only parameters efficiently

yes, michel and me discussed this a bit. we need an issue in mlr3tuning now to documents the current thoughts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants