-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
learner API: new function predict_trace #50
Comments
Proposal: tag the Param with "sequential" |
that is not very precise, and debatable whether the "s" param in glmnet falls under it |
Then the Param would have the tags "train" , "predict" and "predict_sequential", right? |
I think the current "predict" tag is actually enough, but we would have to adjust tuning to handle predict-time-only parameters efficiently |
yes, michel and me discussed this a bit. we need an issue in mlr3tuning now to documents the current thoughts |
many learners have a "sequence" parameter so you can get full trace from a single training run.
e.g. ntree, boosting rounds, or the "s" param in glmnet
this is should be supported.
basically we need to allow to "mark up" one hyperparam in the set, with a tag.
and then maybe not have a new predict_trace function but handle this in the normal predict
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: