Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Platform #176

Closed
spitters opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Platform #176

spitters opened this issue Apr 6, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@spitters
Copy link

spitters commented Apr 6, 2021

Inclusion in platform will aid easy installation on all OSes:
https://github.com/coq/platform

@samuelgruetter
Copy link
Contributor

Are you suggesting that bedrock2 should be part of the Coq platform? As far as I understand, the Coq platform is supposed to only contain somewhat stable, mature and easy to use packages which are ready for use by a wider audience, and I think bedrock2 clearly has not yet reached that point. Or in other words: Someone who is experienced enough to deal with the rough edges currently present in bedrock2 is certainly also experienced enough to install bedrock2 on any OS.

@spitters
Copy link
Author

spitters commented Apr 6, 2021

@samuelgruetter you may be right. We're depending on the bedrock2 for our work in Aarhus. If you can find two other projects, bedrock2 qualifies for inclusion:
https://github.com/coq/platform/blob/2021.02/charter.md#package-inclusion-process

As a rule, it simplifies our life to have our dependencies (in this case bedrock2) in platform.

Perhaps related to the CI issue:
#170

@samuelgruetter
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not sure if it would actually simplify your life, because anyone trying to use bedrock2 still encounters issues (eg #175) that need to get fixed in order for them to continue working on their project.
Now, if someone was using bedrock2 through the Coq platform, they would have to wait for a new release of the Coq platform to get the fix, which might take a long time. On the other hand, if they include bedrock2 as a git submodule, they can just git pull to obtain the fix immediately.

@spitters
Copy link
Author

spitters commented Apr 6, 2021

You may be right, that this is premature. Thanks for the great work on bedrock2.

@spitters spitters closed this as completed Apr 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants