Promise(never, <Thing>)
, hmm, why not Always(<Thing>)
?
#415
Closed
nilslindemann
started this conversation in
Language Development
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am still not fluid in these Promise/Maybe/Result things in functional programming, and so my request may be stupid, but could we have a type
Always(Thing)
which is an alias forPromise(never, <Thing>)
? Looks like a valid shortcut to me.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions