You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wanted to ask you, how did you compute the query speed of tables 3 and 4 of the paper?
I've observed that the current implementation stores each level of language features on a different set of gaussians. Therefore you require 3 rasterization steps to obtain the 2D language features for a given point of view.
Are you taking this rasterization and the posterior decoding time into account, or you are just measuring the query matching with the CLIP features?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, really nice work!
I wanted to ask you, how did you compute the query speed of tables 3 and 4 of the paper?
I've observed that the current implementation stores each level of language features on a different set of gaussians. Therefore you require 3 rasterization steps to obtain the 2D language features for a given point of view.
Are you taking this rasterization and the posterior decoding time into account, or you are just measuring the query matching with the CLIP features?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: