Add HeatlthCheck #26
Add HeatlthCheck #26
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces enhancements to the project, including new health check functionalities for Azure IoT Hub and SQL Server, improved configuration management with required settings, and updates to infrastructure code for role assignments. Package references are added to support these features, while logging and telemetry settings are streamlined in configuration files. Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow is restructured to focus on dependency resolution and build output management, with modifications to streamline the build process. Changes
Tip New featuresWalkthrough comment now includes:
Notes:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (15)
- src/backend/Directory.Packages.props (4 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Extensions/AppSettings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealtChecks/IotHubHealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/StartupExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Program.cs (2 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Development.json (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Production.json (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/modules/iot-hub/iot-hub.bicep (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/modules/iot-hub/role-assignment.bicep (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/parameter-types.bicep (2 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/ts.dev.bicepparam (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/ts.prod.bicepparam (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (22)
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Production.json (2)
5-5: Verify the new KeyVault URL.Ensure that the new URL
"https://kv-ts-prod.vault.azure.net"is correct and accessible.
6-6: Verify the new IoTHubHostName.Ensure that the hostname
"iot-ts-prod.azure-devices.net"is correct and corresponds to the intended Azure IoT Hub.src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Development.json (2)
5-5: Verify the new KeyVault URL.Ensure that the new URL
"https://kv-ts-develop.vault.azure.net/"is correct and accessible.Verification successful
KeyVault URL is correct but access is restricted.
The URL
"https://kv-ts-develop.vault.azure.net/"is valid, but access is restricted, resulting in a 403 Forbidden response. This is expected behavior for Azure KeyVault URLs, which require authentication. Ensure that the necessary credentials and permissions are configured for accessing the KeyVault.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the accessibility of the new KeyVault URL. # Test: Check if the URL is accessible. Expect: HTTP 200 response. curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{http_code}\n" https://kv-ts-develop.vault.azure.net/Length of output: 85
6-6: Verify the new IoTHubHostName.Ensure that the hostname
"iot-ts-develop.azure-devices.net"is correct and corresponds to the intended Azure IoT Hub.src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/StartupExtensions.cs (1)
9-14: Approve the method but verify the implementation ofIotHubHealthCheck.The method
AddHealthCheckis well-implemented and follows best practices. However, ensure that theIotHubHealthCheckis correctly implemented and integrates well with the application.Verification successful
The
IotHubHealthCheckis implemented correctly.The
IotHubHealthCheckclass is properly implemented insrc/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealtChecks/IotHubHealthCheck.cs. It follows the .NET conventions for health checks by implementing theIHealthCheckinterface and includes the necessaryCheckHealthAsyncmethod. This confirms that it integrates well with the application.
- Location:
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealtChecks/IotHubHealthCheck.csScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of `IotHubHealthCheck`. # Test: Search for the implementation details of `IotHubHealthCheck`. Expect: Proper implementation details. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern $'class IotHubHealthCheck { $$$ }'Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to `IotHubHealthCheck` in the codebase to gather more context. rg 'IotHubHealthCheck' -A 5Length of output: 1055
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Program.cs (1)
22-22: Approved: Integration of Health Check.The addition of the
AddHealthCheckmethod is correctly placed within theConfigureServicesmethod. Ensure that the configuration settings used byAddHealthCheckare properly documented and validated.Run the following script to verify the configuration settings:
Verification successful
Health Check Configuration Verified in Codebase
The
AddHealthCheckmethod is correctly implemented in theStartupExtensions.csfile, configuring both SQL Server and IoT Hub health checks. Ensure that the necessary connection strings and settings, such asTelemetryStashDatabase, are present and correctly configured in the application's configuration files.
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/StartupExtensions.cs: ImplementsAddHealthCheckmethod.src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealtChecks/IotHubHealthCheck.cs: Custom health check implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the configuration settings used by `AddHealthCheck`. # Test: Search for the configuration settings in the application configuration files. Expect: Proper documentation and validation rules. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'HealthCheck'Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the configuration settings used by `AddHealthCheck` in JSON and XML files, and search the codebase for direct configuration. # Search for HealthCheck configuration in JSON files rg --type json -A 5 'HealthCheck' # Search for HealthCheck configuration in XML files rg --type xml -A 5 'HealthCheck' # Search for direct configuration of HealthCheck in C# code rg --type cs 'HealthCheck'Length of output: 1986
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealtChecks/IotHubHealthCheck.cs (1)
7-25: Approved: IoT Hub Health Check Implementation.The
IotHubHealthCheckclass is correctly implemented with appropriate use of Azure SDK and configuration settings. Ensure that theIoTHubHostNamesetting is properly documented and validated in the configuration files.Run the following script to verify the
IoTHubHostNamesetting:Verification successful
Configuration Verified: IoTHubHostName Setting Present
The
IoTHubHostNamesetting is correctly configured in both development and production configuration files. This ensures that theIotHubHealthCheckclass can function as intended across different environments.
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Production.jsonsrc/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/appsettings.Development.jsonScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `IoTHubHostName` setting in the configuration files. # Test: Search for the `IoTHubHostName` setting. Expect: Proper documentation and validation rules. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'IoTHubHostName'Length of output: 185
Script:
#!/bin/bash # List all configuration files to determine their types. fd --type f --extension yaml --extension json --extension xml # Search for the `IoTHubHostName` setting across all configuration files. rg 'IoTHubHostName'Length of output: 1182
src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/modules/iot-hub/role-assignment.bicep (1)
6-30: Well-implemented Azure Bicep module for IoT Hub role assignments.The implementation of role assignments in this Bicep file is well-documented and follows best practices for Azure resource management. The use of the
guidfunction to ensure unique names and the structured approach to defining role definitions are particularly noteworthy. Good job on maintaining clarity and consistency in the code.src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/ts.prod.bicepparam (1)
78-79: Proper addition ofroleAssignmentsto IoT Hub parameters.The new
roleAssignmentsproperty in theiotHubParametersobject is well-placed and initialized correctly as an empty array. This setup allows for easy future configuration of role assignments, aligning with the infrastructure changes in the Bicep files. The implementation is clean and maintains the overall structure of the file.src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/ts.dev.bicepparam (1)
77-83: Well-structured role assignment configuration.The addition of
roleAssignmentstoiotHubParametersis correctly implemented with appropriate references touserDefinitions. Ensure that the role 'IoTHubDataReader' aligns with the intended access permissions for the user group.Consider verifying the role definition 'IoTHubDataReader' to ensure it meets the security and access requirements of your infrastructure.
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj (4)
11-11: Appropriate addition for IoT Hub health monitoring.The inclusion of
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHubis suitable for enhancing the health monitoring capabilities of Azure IoT Hub within the application.
12-12: Essential package for SQL Server health monitoring.The inclusion of
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServeris crucial for monitoring the health of SQL Server connections, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance reliability.
17-17: Relevant addition for HTTP-triggered functions.The inclusion of
Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Httpsupports HTTP-triggered functions, which is likely necessary for the new health check endpoints.
24-24: Crucial framework for implementing health checks.The inclusion of
Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecksprovides the necessary framework for implementing the new health check functionalities in the application.src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/parameter-types.bicep (1)
96-96: Enhanced permission management for IoT Hub.The addition of
roleAssignmentstoiotHubParamsenhances the flexibility and control over permissions, aligning with the PR's objectives. Ensure that this implementation functions as expected in actual deployments.Consider verifying the implementation of
roleAssignmentsin a live environment to ensure it meets the intended functionality.src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/modules/iot-hub/iot-hub.bicep (1)
87-87: Output declaration foriotHubNameis correctly implemented.The output
iotHubNameis correctly declared and follows best practices for Bicep modules. Ensure that this output is utilized appropriately in dependent modules or deployments.Run the following script to verify the usage of
iotHubNameacross other modules:Verification successful
Output declaration for
iotHubNameis correctly implemented and utilized.The
iotHubNameoutput is appropriately declared and used across the codebase, as evidenced by its presence in parameters, properties, and module outputs. This confirms its correct integration into the infrastructure setup.
iotHubNameis declared as a parameter.- It is used in a name property.
- It is referenced as an output from a module.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `iotHubName` across other modules. # Test: Search for the usage of `iotHubName`. Expect: References in other Bicep files. rg --type bicep -A 5 $'iotHubName'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all .bicep files and search for the usage of `iotHubName`. # Find all .bicep files and search for `iotHubName` within them. fd --extension bicep --exec rg 'iotHubName' {}Length of output: 178
src/backend/Directory.Packages.props (4)
6-6: Package addition for Azure IoT Hub health checks is correctly implemented.The package
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHubis correctly added. Verify that version8.0.1is the latest stable version available.Run the following script to verify the package version:
Verification successful
Package version is up-to-date.
The package
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHubis correctly added with the latest version8.0.1. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHub`. # Test: Search for the package version in the NuGet repository. Expect: Version `8.0.1` is the latest stable version. echo "Check NuGet for the latest version of AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHub"Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `AspNetCore.HealthChecks.Azure.IoTHub` using the NuGet API. # Fetch the latest version of the package from the NuGet API curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/aspnetcore.healthchecks.azure.iothub/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[-1]'Length of output: 126
16-16: Package addition for Azure Functions HTTP support is correctly implemented.The package
Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Httpis correctly added. Verify that version3.2.0is the latest stable version available.Run the following script to verify the package version:
Verification successful
Package version is up-to-date.
The package
Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Httpis correctly added with the latest stable version3.2.0. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Http`. # Test: Search for the package version in the NuGet repository. Expect: Version `3.2.0` is the latest stable version. echo "Check NuGet for the latest version of Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Http"Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Http`. # Fetch the latest stable version from the NuGet API latest_version=$(curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.azure.functions.worker.extensions.http/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[-1]') echo "Latest stable version of Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Worker.Extensions.Http is $latest_version"Length of output: 332
30-30: Package addition for diagnostics health checks is correctly implemented.The package
Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecksis correctly added. Verify that version8.0.8is the latest stable version available.Run the following script to verify the package version:
Verification successful
Version 8.0.8 is the latest stable version for Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks.
The current version
8.0.8is the latest stable release available, and it is appropriate for use in production environments. The latest version found,9.0.0-preview.7.24406.2, is a preview version and not recommended for production. No changes are necessary.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks`. # Test: Search for the package version in the NuGet repository. Expect: Version `8.0.8` is the latest stable version. echo "Check NuGet for the latest version of Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks"Length of output: 176
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks`. # Fetch the package metadata from the NuGet API response=$(curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/microsoft.extensions.diagnostics.healthchecks/index.json") # Extract the latest version from the response latest_version=$(echo "$response" | jq -r '.versions[-1]') # Output the latest version echo "Latest stable version of Microsoft.Extensions.Diagnostics.HealthChecks: $latest_version" # Check if the current version is the latest if [ "$latest_version" == "8.0.8" ]; then echo "Version 8.0.8 is the latest stable version." else echo "Version 8.0.8 is not the latest stable version. Latest is $latest_version." fiLength of output: 7862
7-7: Package addition for SQL Server health checks is correctly implemented.The package
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServeris correctly added. Verify that version8.0.2is the latest stable version available.Run the following script to verify the package version:
Verification successful
Package version is up-to-date.
The package
AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServeris correctly added with the latest stable version8.0.2. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServer`. # Test: Search for the package version in the NuGet repository. Expect: Version `8.0.2` is the latest stable version. echo "Check NuGet for the latest version of AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServer"Length of output: 152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the package version for `AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServer`. # Fetch the latest version information from the NuGet API latest_version=$(curl -s "https://api.nuget.org/v3-flatcontainer/aspnetcore.healthchecks.sqlserver/index.json" | jq -r '.versions[-1]') # Output the latest version echo "Latest version of AspNetCore.HealthChecks.SqlServer: $latest_version" # Compare with the version in the codebase if [ "$latest_version" == "8.0.2" ]; then echo "Version 8.0.2 is the latest stable version." else echo "Version 8.0.2 is not the latest stable version. Latest is $latest_version." fiLength of output: 391
src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep (2)
141-141: Modification tokeyVaultRoleAssignmentModuleenhances clarity.The update to include a
resourceNameparameter in thegetResourceNamefunction call is a good practice for clarity and maintainability. This change is approved.
124-137: New module for IoT Hub role assignments is correctly implemented.The
iotHubRoleAssignmentModuleis correctly declared and utilizes outputs from other modules effectively. Ensure that this module integrates well with other parts of the infrastructure and that the role assignments are correctly applied in the Azure environment.Run the following script to verify the integration of
iotHubRoleAssignmentModulewith other modules:
src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/parameter-types.bicep
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Extensions/AppSettings.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/local.settings.json (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep (2 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/parameter-types.bicep (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/local.settings.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Extensions/AppSettings.cs
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/parameter-types.bicep
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
- src/backend/global.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/backend/global.json
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1)
38-38: Approve the addition of the Linux x64 runtime specification.The change to specify
--runtime linux-x64in the build command is a good practice for ensuring compatibility with the intended deployment environment. However, it's crucial to verify that this runtime specification aligns with other deployment and testing configurations within the project.Run the following script to check for consistency in runtime specifications across the workflow:
Verification successful
Verification successful: Runtime specification is consistent.
The
--runtime linux-x64specification is correctly applied in the build step of the workflow. There are no conflicting runtime specifications in the surrounding steps, ensuring consistency in the build process. This aligns with the intended deployment environment. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the runtime specification is consistent across different workflow steps. # Test: Search for runtime specifications in the workflow file. Expect: Consistent use of `linux-x64`. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'--runtime linux-x64' .github/workflows/backend-build.ymlLength of output: 501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the runtime specification is consistent across different workflow steps. # Test: Search for runtime specifications in the workflow file. Expect: Consistent use of `linux-x64`. rg --type yaml -A 5 '--runtime linux-x64' .github/workflows/backend-build.ymlLength of output: 501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the runtime specification is consistent across different workflow steps. # Test: Search for runtime specifications in the workflow file. Expect: Consistent use of `linux-x64`. rg --type yaml -A 5 -- '--runtime linux-x64' .github/workflows/backend-build.ymlLength of output: 326
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1)
41-41: Issue Found:BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYis not set.The
BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYenvironment variable is not set, which is necessary for thedotnet restorecommand to function correctly. Please ensure that this variable is defined and assigned the correct directory path in the workflow or any relevant configuration files.
- Check the
.github/workflows/backend-build.ymlfile for any missing definitions or assignments related toBACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORY.- Verify if there are any other scripts or configuration files that should set this variable.
Analysis chain
Approved with verification: Modification to
dotnet restorecommand.The change to use
BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYinstead ofinputs.projectDirectoryis approved. However, verify thatBACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYis correctly set and points to the intended directory.Run the following script to verify the setup of
BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORY:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the setup of `BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORY`. # Test: Check if the environment variable is set correctly. Expect: Correct directory path. echo "BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORY is set to: $BACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORY"Length of output: 78
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (2 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml
36-36: the runner of "actions/setup-dotnet@v1" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1)
19-19: Approved: Addition ofDOTNET_CORE_VERSION_INPROCenvironment variable.The addition of this environment variable is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives to manage .NET Core versions for specific tasks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Database/Ts.TelemetryDatabase.Sql/Ts.TelemetryDatabase.Sql.sqlproj (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/backend/Database/Ts.TelemetryDatabase.Sql/Ts.TelemetryDatabase.Sql.sqlproj (1)
11-11: Approved: Addition of<TargetFramework>net472</TargetFramework>The addition of the
<TargetFramework>element to specify .NET Framework 4.7.2 is approved. This change ensures that the project targets a specific version of the .NET Framework, which can help in maintaining consistent behavior and compatibility.Please verify the following to ensure smooth integration and deployment:
- Check all project dependencies and references for compatibility with .NET Framework 4.7.2.
- Assess the impact on deployment and runtime behavior to ensure that no issues arise due to the framework change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-functions-main-cicd.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/backend-functions-main-cicd.yml (1)
30-30: Verify the new secret for deployment.The change in the
publishProfilesecret fromfunc_ts_develop_5119tofunc_ts_develop_AF50is critical for the deployment process. Ensure that the new secret is correctly configured in the GitHub repository and aligns with the intended deployment credentials and environment.Run the following script to verify the presence and configuration of the new secret:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (2)
38-38: Approved: Specification of runtime indotnet build.Including
-r linux-x64ensures the build targets the correct runtime environment. Verify that this runtime is compatible with the deployment targets and other parts of the project.Run the following script to verify the runtime compatibility:
35-35: Approved: Standardization of directory usage indotnet restore.The change from
inputs.projectDirectorytoBACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYimproves consistency in directory usage. Ensure thatBACKEND_BASE_DIRECTORYis correctly set and used across the project.Run the following script to verify the environment variable usage:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/ServiceDependencies/func-ts-develop - Zip Deploy/storage1.arm.json (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/serviceDependencies.func-ts-develop - Zip Deploy.json (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/serviceDependencies.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/serviceDependencies.func-ts-develop - Zip Deploy.json
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/serviceDependencies.json (1)
1-8: Approved: JSON configuration for service dependencies.The JSON structure is correct and clearly defines the dependency on Azure storage with the appropriate connection ID.
src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Properties/ServiceDependencies/func-ts-develop - Zip Deploy/storage1.arm.json (1)
1-70: Approved: ARM template for Azure resource deployment.The ARM template is well-structured and follows best practices, including the use of parameters and metadata for clarity. The deployment strategy using
uniqueStringfor uniqueness is correctly implemented.Please ensure to test this deployment in a test environment to verify that all resources are correctly provisioned and behave as expected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs (1 hunks)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj (2 hunks)
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Ts.Functions.csproj
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml
- src/backend/Functions/Ts.Functions/Health/HealthCheck.cs
- src/backend/Infrastructure/Ts.Infrastructure/main.bicep
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (3)
34-35: Verify dependency resolution.The restore step is commented out, which might be intentional to streamline the build process. However, ensure that dependencies are still being resolved correctly, possibly in another part of the workflow or through the build script itself.
37-42: Approve the build step changes, but verify the output directory.The use of
pushdandpopdis a good practice for managing directory context in scripts. Ensure that the build artifacts are correctly placed in the specified output directory.
50-51: Verify artifact handling post-build.The publish step is commented out, which might be part of the restructuring. Ensure that the artifacts are still being handled correctly, especially if they are required for deployment or further testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml
49-49: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"
(action)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (3)
33-33: Approved: Updated restore command.The modification to the restore command is straightforward and aligns with the PR's objective to streamline the build process.
38-38: Approved: Specified target runtime in build command.Including the
-r linux-x64option is a significant addition for ensuring cross-platform compatibility.
40-41: Skip: Existing comment still valid.The reminder to re-enable backend tests is still applicable.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/backend-build.yml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml
49-49: input "include-hidden-files" is not defined in action "actions/upload-artifact@v4". available inputs are "compression-level", "if-no-files-found", "name", "overwrite", "path", "retention-days"
(action)
Additional comments not posted (2)
.github/workflows/backend-build.yml (2)
38-38: Approved: Enhanced cross-platform compatibility.The addition of
-r linux-x64to the build command is a significant enhancement for ensuring that the application can be built for the Linux x64 platform. This aligns well with modern development practices that aim for cross-platform compatibility.
44-44: Approved: Consistent build and publish configurations.The inclusion of
-r linux-x64in the publish command ensures that the application is consistently configured across both build and publish stages. This is crucial for maintaining reliable and predictable builds.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Configuration Changes
Infrastructure Enhancements