-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
3.1.0 release #3484
3.1.0 release #3484
Conversation
I think following PRs could be included in this release:
for the remaining, we may need more times to review/implement. |
Works for me! Other than the pull requests already mentioned, I have nothing to add that I think needs to get in for the release. And I agree with the next release being 3.1.0 instead of 3.0.1, since so many new features have been added. Once those other pull requests mentioned above have all been merged, I'll run all the CRAN checks (manual We won't be able to submit the R package to CRAN until November but I'm ok with doing the rest of the release before then and not waiting on CRAN. Also as a reminder from #3338 ...I'll do the CRAN submission this time. |
@guolinke I hope it's ok, I updated |
Release checklist:
|
As of #3335, |
@jameslamb Cool! Then I'm striking this bullet out from the list. |
@shiyu1994 what is the ETA of your improvement for dense histogram construction? I think this PR is waiting for it. |
I've marked #3520 as blocking issue, I think we can include fix for it in |
Now that all of the PRs in #3484 (comment) have been fixed, if CI passes are we ready to release? Should I submit the R package to CRAN? |
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | |||
#! /bin/sh | |||
# Guess values for system-dependent variables and create Makefiles. | |||
# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for lightgbm 3.0.0.99. | |||
# Generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69 for lightgbm 3.1.0. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/gha run r-valgrind
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/gha build r-artifacts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks like this job is broken:
Error: Input 'submodules' not supported when falling back to download using the GitHub REST API. To create a local Git repository instead, add Git 2.18 or higher to the PATH.
run: https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/runs/1404264739?check_suite_focus=true
I opened #3567. It doesn't have to be fixed for the release. I can build the package locally.
oh wait I forgot about #3513. I'll open a PR right now that skips the problematic tests for now. |
What about #3484 (comment) (#3475)? |
Also, I'd like to mark this release as the last one which supports Python 2. So that our next minor release (in 2021 I believe) will drop Python 2 support (1 year after Python 2 EOL). I guess it's time. Does anyone have any objections? |
I am going to merge this in 24 hours and draft a new release. |
@jameslamb Any cran's issuse to address? I think we can submit this release to cran. |
I'll try R Hub Solaris checks on this branch one more time right now. I think some things have been merged here since the last time I did that. If those checks pass (should only take 10-20 minutes), I'll submit a CRAN submission. Is that OK? |
@jameslamb no problem, thank you! |
no issues found on Solaris (https://artifacts.r-hub.io/lightgbm_3.1.0.tar.gz-048076e707fd42c695b805753f65aa44/lightgbm.Rcheck/), I'm going to submit to CRAN 😀 @guolinke I think that since I'm not the maintainer in |
I've submitted to CRAN! @guolinke they'll send you an email next asking you to confirm the submission
|
@StrikerRUS can you help for the Homebrew formula? |
Sure. PR proposed: Homebrew/homebrew-core#64933 Seems Homebrew started to support Big Sur! 👍 Homebrew/homebrew-core@d80a8b5#diff-5e461287a37b620a7dd2f18a9c1706d10371608f3384c032bb732aa2a08117f6 |
woo, thanks! |
@guolinke have you received an email from CRAN? According to https://lockedata.github.io/cransays/articles/dashboard.html, |
I think I already comfirm it and receive their auto reply:
|
oh great, thank you! |
It seems we got accept: But the checks are not updated yet: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_lightgbm.html |
!!! Exciting! I'm going to wait a few days before publicizing this or updating the documentation, in case we get surprised like last time. But I'm hopeful 😀 |
I've been refreshing https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_lightgbm.html every few hours. More checks are slowly rolling in. Right now we're passing on Windows, Mac, Solaris, and Linux Soon we should know if we're passing |
@jameslamb According to https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_lightgbm.html it looks like we need to add |
I created #3585 , let's move this discussion there instead of keeping it on this closed PR |
I guess we simply don't have any 32-bit CI jobs. |
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity since it was closed. To start a new related discussion, open a new issue at https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/issues including a reference to this. |
No description provided.