Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Doubly defined LEXICON in lexc not reported #29

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 11, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

Doubly defined LEXICON in lexc not reported #29

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Nov 11, 2015 · 0 comments
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link 

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. in Lexc file:
  LEXICON AddVerb
   ...
  LEXICON AddVerb
   ...

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
A warning, that LEXICON AddVerb is doubly defined
Instead: No warning, both LEXICONs are happily used.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eleonor...@gmx.net on 3 Apr 2012 at 10:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
auto-migrated Priority-Medium Type-Defect
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@GoogleCodeExporter