You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Parallel execution currently auto-picks core count (src/parallel_mmap.zig). Expose a --threads N flag to cap it — useful for benchmarking, CI, and shared machines.
Scope: parse flag, thread the value into the parallel engine's worker count. 0/absent = auto (current behavior).
Hi! I’d like to work on this issue. I’ve reviewed the relevant CLI options and parallel execution code, and I plan to add the --threads N option while preserving the current auto-detection behavior when the value is 0 or omitted. I’ll also add tests and update the help documentation. Please let me know if there are any implementation preferences I should follow.
Hi there. If you need more details please let me know. The thread count is
pulled by default the total core. It is very straight forward issue. Take
your time, let me know if you have any questions .
Cheers
On Tue, Jul 14, 2026 at 5:23 PM Ehtasham Yasin ***@***.***> wrote:
*Ehtasham-Yasin* left a comment (melihbirim/csvql#51)
<#51 (comment)>
Hi! I’d like to work on this issue. I’ve reviewed the relevant CLI options
and parallel execution code, and I plan to add the --threads N option
while preserving the current auto-detection behavior when the value is 0
or omitted. I’ll also add tests and update the help documentation. Please
let me know if there are any implementation preferences I should follow.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#51?email_source=notifications&email_token=AADBLTKXZNB7IPVZ3ZGTNVT5EZNA5A5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTIOJXGE2DSMBQGQ42M4TFMFZW63VGMF2XI2DPOKSWK5TFNZ2KYZTPN52GK4S7MNWGSY3L#issuecomment-4971490049>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADBLTLMZSUBKWKBCBGELTT5EZNA5AVCNFSNUABGKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMYTCNRUGY2TOMRTGU5US43TOVSTWNBYG4ZDKOBXGE4DNILWAI>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
Activity
Ehtasham-Yasin commentedon Jul 14, 2026
Hi! I’d like to work on this issue. I’ve reviewed the relevant CLI options and parallel execution code, and I plan to add the
--threads Noption while preserving the current auto-detection behavior when the value is0or omitted. I’ll also add tests and update the help documentation. Please let me know if there are any implementation preferences I should follow.melihbirim commentedon Jul 15, 2026
melihbirim commentedon Jul 15, 2026
Also dont forget to star the repo !o!