Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: New negative filter to hide some senders in the media listing #91

Open
gw-issues opened this issue Jan 15, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@gw-issues
Copy link

Feature request:

I would like to ask for a new feature to filter out some senders in the response list. Due to the extrem fragmentation of ORF´s mediathek with one entry per subject (sometimes dozends of entries for one hour of newscast, each only a view seconds long, it is difficult to find the relevant entries).

A negative filter like "-" of more generic a prefix like "-!" could help to reduce the number of responses and help finding releant entries.

@Wikinaut
Copy link
Contributor

I propose to have a further

  • configuration setting (perhaps a separate window)

for such a exclusion list, and when stations are excluded, this should be briefly shown in the main menu or in the list of results.

@bagbag
Copy link
Member

bagbag commented Jan 15, 2018

Thats already in v2 using ^ as negation for all available filters.

so either ^d:<=45s or, because a range can be in any direction, d:>45s (d = duration). But maybe - is better, as I guess some people don't even know how to get a ^.

But please don't ask me when I'll release v2 😅

@andre-st
Copy link

andre-st commented Mar 13, 2019

I just want to support this request with another example: I'd like to exclude "Hörfassung" from the results (in a feed or bookmark): !ard #tatort #polizeiruf ^hörfassung
I once downloaded a wrong movie version and would like to prevent this.
My impression of the v2-branch is that this release is still in the making?

@bagbag
Copy link
Member

bagbag commented Mar 13, 2019

This will definitely come - in fact it's already implemented. Yes, v2 (technically actually v3) is still in "heavy" development, as far as my free time, stamina and other hobby-projects allow.

@LondonRain
Copy link

Missed this also to exclude "klare Sprache" and "Audiodeskription" versions here.
https://mediathekviewweb.de/#query=schimanski%20%3E60

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants