You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to add a test to the surface based explicit hole cutting feature introduced in #231. For now, this feature can be used for some of my and @sseraj's cases. I don't have an easy solution to add a test for this without inflating the test files and the test durations. We need to re-visit this case and test this feature. The test should either flood and fail with the default hole cutting, or we should expose the cell IDs that get blanked with the explicit cutting approach to make sure the implementation remains functional.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description of feature
We need to add a test to the surface based explicit hole cutting feature introduced in #231. For now, this feature can be used for some of my and @sseraj's cases. I don't have an easy solution to add a test for this without inflating the test files and the test durations. We need to re-visit this case and test this feature. The test should either flood and fail with the default hole cutting, or we should expose the cell IDs that get blanked with the explicit cutting approach to make sure the implementation remains functional.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: