Replies: 1 comment
-
| Yes I think replicating the Haplosaurus approach makes the most sense for spliced transcripts. And I agree, adding the ability to create pre-mRNA sequences, and then let splicing-specific models figure out which exons will be included/excluded, is the way to go down the road. | 
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
                  
                    0 replies
                  
                
            
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Related to #24 and #38, how should splicing be implemented? Spooner et al. choose to "not apply any VCF changes in introns or in splice sites" in Haplosaurus and claim this was more correct than to include them. We could do this too (likely won't be terribly hard) and it seems reasonable for an initial implementation. However, later on, would it be better to generate personalized pre-mRNA transcripts and then compute (and cache) splice site predictions (e.g. from SpliceAI) to incorporate intronic/splice site variants?
@bschilder
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions