Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Should we return m.presence events in /sync at all for offline users? (SYN-682) #1535

Open
matrixbot opened this issue Apr 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
A-Presence A-Spec-Compliance places where synapse does not conform to the spec T-Defect Bugs, crashes, hangs, security vulnerabilities, or other reported issues.

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member

Submitted by @​matthew:matrix.org
I'd expect that we wouldn't return any m.presence at all for offline users - and this is what Vector expects

(Imported from https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SYN-682)

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

Jira watchers: @erikjohnston

@matrixbot
Copy link
Member Author

During initial sync?

-- @erikjohnston

@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Should we return m.presence events in /sync at all for offline users? (SYN-682) Should we return m.presence events in /sync at all for offline users? (https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/1535) Nov 7, 2016
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Should we return m.presence events in /sync at all for offline users? (https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/issues/1535) Should we return m.presence events in /sync at all for offline users? (SYN-682) Nov 7, 2016
@reivilibre reivilibre added A-Presence T-Defect Bugs, crashes, hangs, security vulnerabilities, or other reported issues. A-Spec-Compliance places where synapse does not conform to the spec labels May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A-Presence A-Spec-Compliance places where synapse does not conform to the spec T-Defect Bugs, crashes, hangs, security vulnerabilities, or other reported issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants