Skip to content

Tool to find good minification settings to distribute Elm applications

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

marc136/elm-optimize-test

Repository files navigation

README

This repository exists so experimenting with different minification settings becomes easy and one can choose the the tool combination that works best for the codebase.

It can be used to check both IIFE and ESModule minification. So you can either use it like

<script src="./results/iife.js"></script>
<script>
window.Elm.Main.init(...)
</script>

Or like this:

<script type="module">
import { Elm } from './results/esm.mjs';
Elm.Main.init(...)
</script>

Summary

I have reached pretty much the same conclusion as Simon Lydell already published on the Elm discourse

  • For the smallest file size using a single tool, you can either pick UglifyJS or Google's closure compiler. Both take about the same time (9.5-10s in my case).
  • But you can achieve the same size result by running just parts of UglifyJS and then esbuild in ~40% of the time (~3.5s).
  • Esbuild alone produces ~10% more code than UglifyJS, but it needs only ~2% of the time (~0.1s) when directly writing to a file.
  • SWC is comparable to Esbuild in compilation time, but not yet in compression ratio (16% bigger). They are working on reaching parity to terser.
  • Terser produces ~4% more code than UglifyJS but only needs 60% of the time.

If you are interested in my values, look at results.md.

This repo

Is designed so you can clone it and then run all the minification options on your Elm projects.
To compile one or more Elm apps into one js file and then minify it using the different tools, e.g. run this:

❯ npx ts-eager compare-minify-elm-esm src/*.elm

After that you can alter ./results/results.html and then open it in your browser to see the compiled file works for your codebase.
If you need special behavior to initialize an Elm app like flags, you should alter ./template.html accordingly. As this file will be copied on every run, you can safely rm -rf results.

Tools

TODO

  • Add compilation with elm-optimize-level-2
  • Create a report page similar to https://evmar.github.io/js-min-bench/
  • Change results/results.html, so it allows the user to initialize every compiled Elm app and every minified variant by clicking inside that html file.
  • And to make this available as a tool on npm

Notes

This extends results gathered by Lydell

The major work of the IIFE minification was done by Lydell and posted to https://discourse.elm-lang.org/t/what-i-ve-learned-about-minifying-elm-code/7632

Transforming compiled Elm code to an ESModule

Converting the compiled Elm code from an IIFE to an ESM is done very similar to elm-esm. Just with less RegEx (and with relying on the minifier tool to remove unused code).

esbuild

Note by lydell on a thread about minification with esbuild which contains several interesting comments about esbuild.

NOTE: To get dead code elimination with an ESModule, you currently need to use format:"esm" and bundle:true with esbuild@0.12.22.
I created the issue evanw/esbuild#1551 and it seems like that strange behavior will not go away as it is necessary for the svelte compiler (it appends code that uses otherwise unused code).

terser

TODO try ecma: 2015 (or 2020?) for shorter code https://github.com/terser/terser#format-options

compress option: module (default false) -- Pass true when compressing an ES6 module. Strict mode is implied and the toplevel option as well.

Idea to minify IIFE and then change it to ESM

Initial idea: Prepend export const Elm = , take after first { and drop })(this); at the end, and then append ;. But that will not work.

Anaylized generated code:

iife_closure_*: (function(tg){...]})(this);\n

iife_esbuild_*: (function(){...})();\n Problem: The different compilation settings add window.Elm in different ways, and none pass this to the IIFE. But for esbuild it does not make sense, as the compiling with format:esm achieves the same size. So I can ignore this.

iife_uglify_1 (function(n){...})(this);\n iife_uglify_[2-4] !(function(n){...}(this);\n iife_uglify_6 (function(r){...})(this);\n

iife_uglify+esbuild_0.js (function(No){...})(this);\n iife_uglify+esbuild_1.js (function(Go){...})(this);\n iife_uglify+esbuild_2.js (function(la){...})(this);\n

What works is: Prepend const scope = {};, then slice until last occurence of ( and append (scope);export const Elm=scope.Elm;\n.

Implemented idea: Replace (function(r){"use strict"; at the beginning with const r={};, then replace })(this); at the end with export const Elm = r.Elm;.
This means that we replace 35 chars with 36, so the size will be pretty much the same.


Links

List of prior art (some were also referenced in the text above):