You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Simulations are currently tied to GRCh37/hg19, which is methodologically fine for now. But it would be nice to have options for GRCh38/hg38 soon.
An easy fix would be to include a gene list using these positions, independent loci, and hapmap sites. Then two versions of a sample_script could point to either set of data while recommending the use of the newer GRCh38 high-coverage, recalled genotypes for 1000G.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Simulations are currently tied to GRCh37/hg19, which is methodologically fine for now. But it would be nice to have options for GRCh38/hg38 soon.
An easy fix would be to include a gene list using these positions, independent loci, and hapmap sites. Then two versions of a sample_script could point to either set of data while recommending the use of the newer GRCh38 high-coverage, recalled genotypes for 1000G.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: