Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Address Book Bug] Template filter \Magento\Framework\Filter\Template cannot deal with improper input #39353

Open
2 of 5 tasks
wubinworks opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Area: Account Component: Customer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Progress: ready for dev Reported on 2.4.7 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch

Comments

@wubinworks
Copy link

Preconditions and environment

User input value such as {{var firstname}} is parsed in Address Book.

  • Magento version: 2.4.3 ~ 2.4.7
  • Reproduce: see images below
  • It seems there are no security/performance/info leak issues

Steps to reproduce

01

Magento 2.4.7 + use the system default HTML Address Template
Company: {{if city}}{{var city}}, {{/if}}
Street Address(street1): {{var firstname}}{{var lastname}}{{var country}}


02


03


04

Expected result

The displayed address should be what the customer input.
{{something}} should not be parsed.

Actual result

Customer input got parsed.

Additional information

The cause is this line Template.php#L317.
str_replace is dangerous when you don't know what will be replaced, how many times the original string will be modified.
The best way is to sanitize the user input. The "deferred directives" may not be reliable because you still cannot control the user input value.

Release note

No response

Triage and priority

  • Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
  • Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Hi @wubinworks. Thank you for your report.
To speed up processing of this issue, make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce.


Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.
⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.
🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Hi @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).
  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue.
  • 3. Add Area: XXXXX label to the ticket, indicating the functional areas it may be related to.
  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch
    Details- If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo added the Reported on 2.4.7 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. label Nov 11, 2024
@engcom-Bravo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @wubinworks,

Thanks for your reporting and collaboration.

We have verified the issue in Latest 2.4-develop instance and the issue is reproducible.Kindly refer the screenshots.

Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 28 02 Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 28 12

Customer input got parsed in Address Book and also in Customer view in admin.

But it is working fine in Admin side addresses

Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 10 27 54

Hence Confirming the issue.

Thanks.

@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo added Component: Customer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Area: Account labels Nov 12, 2024
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/AC-13341 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Nov 12, 2024

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Bravo, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Account Component: Customer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P3 May be fixed according to the position in the backlog. Progress: ready for dev Reported on 2.4.7 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants